Contraceptive Alignment
A Descriptive Study of Concordance between Preferred and Actual Contraceptive Method Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24020169 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephanie Arteaga (0000-0002-7064-1642, University of California, Berkeley), Ariana H Bennett (0000-0001-6968-9465, University of California, Berkeley), Anne M Gomez (0000-0002-9461-4411, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author), Anu Manchikanti Gomez |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Family Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sifp.70062 |
| PMID | 42563497 |
| OpenAlex | W7197003276 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Conventional metrics of contraceptive need focus on contraceptive use among those not seeking pregnancy, ignoring individuals' contraceptive preferences beyond pregnancy prevention. We examine contraceptive alignment, a novel metric describing agreement between actual and preferred method use/nonuse, among a 2022 nationally representative U.S. sample of 15-44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth (unweighted n = 3,044). Most respondents (62.2 percent) were classified as having contraceptive alignment (using a method they preferred or not using a method when they preferred not to), while 37.8 percent did not have contraceptive alignment. Contraceptive alignment was higher among contraceptive nonusers who were older and in a serious relationship, as well as both contraceptive users and nonusers who were classified as having higher contraceptive self-efficacy. Contraceptive alignment was lower among contraceptive users who selected their current method due to being unable to obtain the method they originally wanted and those who were using more than one method of contraception. Our findings suggest that conventional measures of contraceptive need may mask important discordance in individuals' contraceptive preferences and actual use that can contribute to misdirected efforts to expand contraceptive access and undermine reproductive autonomy. Contraceptive alignment may more accurately portray individuals' contraceptive needs.
Concordance · Contraceptive Devices · Developed country · Family planning · Fertility · Male contraceptive · Population · Research methodology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies
Fertile Matters
On Chi-Squared Tests for Multiway Contingency Tables with Cell Proportions Estimated from Survey Data
“It just happens”
Under (implicit) pressure
Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans
High Self-Efficacy Is Associated with Prescription Contraceptive Use
It's Not Planned, But Is It Okay? The Acceptability of Unplanned Pregnancy Among Young People
Young Women's Perspectives About the Contraceptive Counseling Received During Their Emergency Contraception Visit
More Than a Destination
Medical mistrust among women with intersecting marginalized identities
Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm
The Misclassification of Ambivalence in Pregnancy Intentions
We Kind of Met In‐Between ”
Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States, 2004
Predictors of Contraceptive Self-Efficacy and Condom Use Among Young Black Women Who Have Sex With Women and Men
Toward a New Definition of Unmet Need for Contraception
Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods
Contraceptive Concordance
Assessing the Suitability of Unmet Need as a Proxy for Access to Contraception and Desire to Use It
Measurement of Unmet Need for Contraception
Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low‐Income Postpartum Texans
Preference‐Aligned Fertility Management as a Person‐Centered Alternative to Contraceptive Use‐Focused Measures
Is That A Method of Birth Control?” A Qualitative Exploration of Young Women’s Use of Withdrawal
Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans-results of qualitative research
Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth
Supply-Side Versus Demand-Side Unmet Need
Contraceptive Self-Efficacy
Reproductive Oppression Enters the Twenty-First Century
| Highly cited | No |
|---|