“We Were in Solidarity with Each Other”
Oral Histories on Coming Out During the Aids Crisis in Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24029802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth Fitting (0000-0002-6849-3695, Dalhousie University, corresponding author), Joseph Lahey (Independent researcher), Dani Sherwood (Independent researcher), Margaret Robinson (0000-0002-2677-0607, Dalhousie University), Nick J Mulé (0000-0002-7019-6067, York University), Schem Bader (Independent Dance) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Homosexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0091-8369 • E-ISSN: 1540-3602 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00918369.2026.2711854 |
| PMID | 42573459 |
| OpenAlex | W7202069361 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
This paper explores identifying, "coming out" and "coming in" as Two Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or queer (2SLGBTQ+) during the AIDS crisis in Canada (1981-1997). We conducted 30 oral history interviews about this unique historical moment between 2022 and 2025 with participants from eight Canadian provinces. Informed by queer oral history, we approached community as multiple, and at times, contradictory. We sought interviews from racialized and rural participants, and women, to help further diversify existing archival materials. Our analysis highlights the ways interviewees described coming out and visibility not only as an ongoing, relational, and a strategically managed process, but as a form of solidarity, care, and responsibility to others during the AIDS crisis. This sense of responsbility to others, and to create more inclusive spaces and services, was pronounced for interviewees who experienced racism in LGBT spaces and Canadian society at large. Two Spirit participants described complex processes of returning to community shaped by colonial violence as well as the cultural ethic of noninterference. We found that for HIV+ interviewees, sharing they were seropositive with others was a more difficult process of disclosure, with higher stakes. Across the narratives, realizations about sexual and gender difference were closely tied to gender nonconformity. Overall, the findings underscore how community was forged through the urgent need for solidarity in the context of the AIDS crisis.
Colonialism · Context (archaeology) · Oral history · Queer · Racism · Solidarity · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Stress, Social Support, and HIV-Status Disclosure to Family and Friends Among HIV-Positive Men and Women
The Second Closet
‘You will always have to “out” yourself’
Queers in the Line of Fire
Trans/Feminist Oral History
The Meaning of Coming Out
Coming Out
Them Ol’ Nasty Lesbians”—Queer Memory, Place, and Rural Formations of Lesbian
Negotiating Identities/Queering Desires
Coming Out in the Aids Era
Coming out and coming back
Queer country
Dissonance and Multiplicity in Queer Oral History Narratives
Toward an Ethos of Trans Care in Trans Oral History
What Makes Queer Oral History Different
Homosexuality and the City
Organising care and community in the era of the ‘gay disease’
Interpreting a cultural value
An Archive of Feelings
Systemic Activism
Rethinking queer migration through the body
Status Passages
Paradoxes of Sexuality, Gay Identity, and the Closet
Hiding in the closet
Coming Out' in the Age of Social Constructionism
Stigmatized Individuals and the Process of Identity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |