Predictive and concurrent validity of caregiver reported early childhood development assessments

Many directly assessed and caregiver-reported measures of early childhood development (ECD) are used to monitor outcomes and evaluate interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many assessments of ECD for children 0–3 years old have robust psychometric properties, but relatively little is known about their ability to predict later developmental and learning outcomes. To address questions about predictive and concurrent validity, we used longitudinal data on three widely used measures of ECD from 487 children in Tanzania. This study examined the predictive validity of the Caregiver-Reported Early Development Instrument (CREDI) at 12 months of age with the directly assessed International Early Learning and Development Assessment (IDELA) and the caregiver-reported Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI 2030) administered at 3.5-6 years of age. We also examined the concurrent validity of the IDELA and ECDI2030 administered on the same day. Consistent with prior literature examining the predictive validity of ECD assessments in very young children, we find statistically significant but practically small (~.1 to.2) correlations between age-adjusted CREDI scores measured in infancy and both IDELA and ECDI2030 scores measured at preschool age. Contrary to expectations, CREDI scores were more predictive for children who took IDELA when older and for children whose mothers did not complete primary education. IDELA overall and domain scores had statistically significant medium-sized (~.4 to.5) correlations with ECDI2030 scores that were slightly larger than relations found in prior research. Our results demonstrate limited predictive power from a caregiver-reported assessment administered in infancy, highlighting how variable ECD is for young children. At preschool age, a directly assessed measure of ECD had better reliability than a shorter caregiver-reported measure, but scores on both measures correlated strongly, suggesting that caregiver-reported measures are capturing similar constructs to directly assessed measures of ECD when implemented at the same point in time.

Child development · Concurrent validity · Early childhood · Longitudinal study · Population · Predictive power · Predictive validity · Psychological intervention · Test (biology) · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Early Childhood Education and Development · Infant Development and Preterm Care

• Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries

  Open Access•Patrice L Engle, Lia C H Fernald et al.•The Lancet•2011

  Incluir item

• Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects

  Open Access•Drew H Bailey, Greg J Duncan et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2020

  Incluir item

• Early childhood development

  Open Access•Bernadette Daelmans, Gary L Darmstadt et al.•The Lancet•2017

  Incluir item

• Early Childhood Investments Substantially Boost Adult Health

  Open Access•Frances A Campbell, Frances Campbell et al.•Science•2014

  Incluir item

• Early childhood development coming of age

  Open Access•Maureen M Black, Susan P Walker et al.•The Lancet•2017

  Incluir item

• The creation of the Global Scales for Early Development (GSED) for children aged 0–3 years

  Open Access•Gareth McCray, Dana Charles Mccoy et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  Incluir item

• Validation of motor, cognitive, language, and socio-emotional subscales using the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments

  Open Access•Marcus Waldman, Dana Charles Mccoy et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  Incluir item

• Validity of caregiver-report measures of language skill for Wolof-learning infants and toddlers living in rural African villages

  Open Access•Anna Margaret Weber, Ann M Weber et al.•Journal of Child Language•2018

  Incluir item

• A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

  Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  Incluir item

• Mostly Harmless Econometrics

  Jorn‐steffen Pischke, Jörn-Steffen Pischke et al.•Mostly Harmless Econometrics•2009

  Incluir item

• The predictive validity of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III at 2 years for later general abilities

  Open Access•Muneera A Rasheed, Ingrid Kvestad et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  Incluir item

• Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries

  Open Access•Bernardita Munoz-Chereau, Lynn Ang et al.•Journal of Early Childhood Research•2021

  Incluir item

• Associations Between Social Support and Symptoms of Antenatal Depression with Infant Growth and Development Among Mothers Living with HIV in Tanzania

  Open Access•Arvin Saleh, Nandita Perumal et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2023

  Incluir item

• Malleability, plasticity, and individuality

  Open Access•Pamela Cantor, David Osher et al.•Applied Developmental Science•2019

  Incluir item

• Monitoring early childhood development at the population level

  Open Access•Peter F Halpin, E Filipa de Castro et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2023

  Incluir item

• Measuring school readiness globally

  Open Access•Sharon Wolf, Peter F Halpin et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2017

  Incluir item

• Concordance between direct assessment and adult report in assessing learning and developmental competencies of young children

  Open Access•Zeyi Li, Nirmala Rao et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2025

  Incluir item

• School readiness and later achievement

  Greg J Duncan, Chantelle J Dowsett et al.•Developmental Psychology•2007

  Incluir item