The EU Conflict of Laws Communitarization and the Modernization of Chinese Private International Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24044455 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qisheng He (0000-0001-6477-4847, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 47-85 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-7250 • E-ISSN: 1868-7059 |
| Publisher | Mohr Siebeck (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1628/003372512798955059 |
| OpenAlex | W1993021130 |
| Language | DE |
| Citations received | 1 |
Since 2007 the EU has adopted the Rome I, Rome II and Rome III Council Regulations codifying and unifying the respective conflict of laws rules in contract, tort and divorce and legal separation. The EU conflict of laws communitarization has attained great achievements. In 2010, China also adopted a self-contained statute - the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Application of Law to Civil Relationships Involving Foreign Interests - which marks a significant step forward in the codification of Chinese private international law (PIL). However, the sources of Chinese PIL are still scattered and diverse because the PIL rules in existing commercial statutes have not been incorporated into this separate PIL statute. In contrast with the EU PIL, there are three issues on which China should devote special attention in further developing its PIL: Firstly, because of a mixed mode of legislation and the scattered sources of Chinese PIL, maintaining harmony between the new statute and the other sources still remains an important task. It remains very important for China to enact PIL provisions in future commercial law legislation. Secondly, the draft of the new statute includes no documents or materials which suggest that the Chinese legislative authority appreciated the tension and need for equilibrium between certainty and flexibility. Thus, the new statute manifests some problems in this regard. Lastly, current Chinese PIL is mainly focused on jurisdiction-selection rules, meaning that the formulation of reasonable content-preference rules is still an important task necessary for the modernization of Chinese PIL.
Comparative law · Conflict of laws · Modernization theory · Political science · Private law · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Corporate Governance and Law · European and International Contract Law · Law
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |