Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sicherung kommunaler Bürgerbegehren Verwaltungsprozessuale Strategien zur Auflösung des Spannungsverhältnisses zwischen repräsentativer und plebiszitärer Demokratie auf kommunaler Ebene

Bibliographic Data

ID24045355
AuthorsSebastian Unger (0009-0000-6251-2923, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume139
Issue1
Pages80-124
Publication date2014-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv des öffentlichen Rechts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-8911 • E-ISSN: 1868-6796
PublisherMohr Siebeck (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1628/000389114x13928952467206
OpenAlexW2324806809
LanguageDE

Citizens exercise their right of democratic participation at municipal level not only through elections but also through referendums. However, when citizens decide to initiate a referendum, the elected local government does not lose the power to deal with the relevant issue itself. As a consequence, a referendum - which regularly aims at pushing through a certain political agenda against the will of the elected institutions - always runs the risk of being thwarted by an opposing decision of these institutions. To counter this risk, the administrative courts have developed procedural means to shield an ongoing referendum from actions by the elected institutions, even where the laws of local government do not feature rules to that effect. In doing so, the courts have autonomously altered the balance between plebiscitary and representative democracy, thereby exceeding their judicial power. From a broader perspective this conflict points to a more general development: The commonly shared feeling that representative democracy finds itself in a state of crisis has given rise to a more plural system of democratic legitimation. In that system established structures of representative decision-making are supplemented or even replaced by alternative instruments of democratic inclusion. Referendums at municipal level are just one of many such instruments which, generally speaking, expand democracy beyond its classical parliamentary form. This expansion of democratic legitimation necessarily leads to frictions where various forms of democratic decision-making are confronted with the same social problem. Against this background, there is a need for »rules of conflict«. Focusing on democratic conflicts at municipal level, the article shows how such rules can be deduced from the relevant statutes and how the courts should deal with them.

Political science · Criminal Law and Policy · Law and Political Science · Public Administration and Political Analysis

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae