Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gema v. OpenAI (Munich I Regional Court, 2025)

Doctrinal, Comparative, and International Perspectives on Copyright and Generative AI

Bibliographic Data

ID24049231
AuthorsTim W Dornis (0000-0003-0103-1047), Jane C Ginsburg (0000-0001-9718-8932), Nicola Lucchi (0000-0001-8611-0072)
Year2026
Volume81
Issue6
Pages235-246
Publication date2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJuristenZeitung (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-6882 • E-ISSN: 1868-7067
PublisherMohr Siebeck (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1628/jz-2026-0084
OpenAlexW7139977745
LanguageDE

This article analyzes the Regional Court of Munich I's decision in the GEMA v. OpenAI case, examining whether training generative AI models on copyrighted works constitutes infringement. The Court held OpenAI liable, finding that AI training creates copyright-relevant reproductions inside generative models not sheltered by text and data mining exceptions under EU and German law. The authors explore the ruling's implications, compare current US fair use litigation, and assess both against the background of international copyright law, particularly the Berne Convention's three-step test.

Copyright law · Generative grammar · Generative model · German · International law · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae