The Collection of Traditions in Monastic and Rabbinic Anthologies as a Reflection of Lived Religion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24049890 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michal Bar‐asher Siegal (0009-0002-8995-7855, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-90 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion in the Roman Empire (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2199-4463 • E-ISSN: 2199-4471 |
| Publisher | Mohr Siebeck (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1628/219944616x14537295637835 |
| OpenAlex | W2916733124 |
| Language | DE |
In this paper I lay the following: I accept and build on the findings of 'lived religion' researchers concerning the polysemous and multi-vocal nature of modern-day religions. Following their conclusion, I assume a similar nature of ancient religions, and offer a possible viewpoint on the cultural bricolage of late antique Jewish and Christian texts. While the project to salvage a thick description of 'lived religion' has some obvious and serious methodological difficulties, a consideration of the genre of literature examined might have ramifications on the question at hand. I suggest that when a religious tradition is transmitted in anthologies, as opposed to edited (or) single writer texts, it might better represent its multi-vocality. The use of anthologies, redacted over time, can offer better glimpses into the multi-vocality of late antique religious societies, if not in practice, but rather in views and beliefs.
Aesthetics · Art · Lived experience · Psychoanalysis · Reflection (computer programming) · Sociology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|