Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Quinlan
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Washington State University Pullman
ANO 2005
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Field Methods
ISSN 1525-822X
E-ISSN 1552-3969
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1525822x05277460
CITAÇÕES 71
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 bce525981af51451d992e7f70a2105fd

Resumo

In freelists, informants create an inventory of all the items they know within a given category. Freelists reveal cultural salience and variation in individuals' topical knowledge. The ease and accuracy of freelist interviewing makes it ideal for collecting data on local knowledge from relatively large samples. This method, however, does not work well with broad topical areas: People tend to omit some items and cluster responses as they unpack mental subcategories. Successive freelisting can reduce and redefine topics (domains), thus focusing the content of interviews. In oral freelists, interviewers should prevent bystanders from contaminating the informant's list, and written freelists are advisable in literate communities. Responses from freelists should be cross-checked with informal methods as much as practicable, as in this Caribbean case. With proper attention to detail, freelisting can amass high-quality ethnobotanical data.

Ferramentas