Competence, Agreement, and Luck

Testing Whether Some People Agree More with a Cultural Truth than Do Others

Bibliographic Data

ID2407424
AuthorsDaniel J Hruschka (0000-0003-2188-7782, Arizona State University), Jonathan N Maupin (0000-0003-2610-2737, Arizona State University)
Year2013
Volume25
Issue2
Pages107-123
Publication date2013-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCAM (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x12453514
OpenAlexW2166142398
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited11

The cultural consensus model (CCM) is a frequently used model of cultural diversity, which predicts how individuals from a common cultural background would share knowledge in a specific domain. Cultural competence, or the degree to which an individual agrees with a local cultural truth, is a central concept in CCM, and many uses of competence estimates rest on the assumption that they reflect real variation among individuals in their knowledge of a cultural truth. However, Weller has shown that even in situations where there are no real differences among individuals in their underlying competences, the CCM will still estimate individual competences that appear to vary, sometimes substantially. To address this issue, we describe a test of the null hypothesis that there is no real difference in competence among individuals. We also present tables with specific cutoffs for this test across a range of data set characteristics. These can help researchers decide whether a specific set of data warrants further analyses of individual differences in competence

Cognitive psychology · Competence (human resources) · Cultural competence · Cultural diversity · Epistemology · Luck · Null model · Sociology · Categorization, perception, and language · Cultural Differences and Values · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub