Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Dorothée Behr , Katharina Meitinger
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Field Methods
ISSN 1525-822X
E-ISSN 1552-3969
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1525822x15625866
CITAÇÕES 8
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 4b426ca6571728aba63da11af61e9e83

Resumo

This study compares the application of probing techniques in cognitive interviewing (CI) and online probing (OP). Even though the probing is similar, the methods differ regarding typical mode setting, sample size, level of interactivity, and goals. We analyzed probing answers to the International Social Survey Programme item battery on specific national pride. While probing answers in CI show indications for a higher response quality, OP can compensate through a larger sample size. Therefore, both methods have complementary strengths with regard to error detection and themes.

Ferramentas