Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Emily Namey , Greg Guest , Kevin McKenna
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA
ANO 2017
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Field Methods
ISSN 1525-822X
E-ISSN 1552-3969
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1525822x16639015
CITAÇÕES 23
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 4c634789e23f6102f9160a950ee69821

Resumo

Few empirical studies exist to guide researchers in determining the number of focus groups necessary for a research study. The analyses described here provide foundational evidence to help researchers in this regard. We conducted a thematic analysis of 40 focus groups on health-seeking behaviors of African American men in Durham, North Carolina. Our analyses revealed that more than 80% of all themes were discoverable within two to three focus groups, and 90% were discoverable within three to six focus groups. Three focus groups were also enough to identify all of the most prevalent themes within the data set. These empirically based findings suggest focus group sample sizes that differ from many of the 'rule of thumb' recommendations in the existing literature. We discuss the relative generalizability of our findings to other study contexts, and we highlight some methodological questions about adequate sample sizes for focus group research.

Ferramentas