Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) J.G. Snodgrass , Michael G. Lacy , H. J. Francois Dengah , Mary C. Meyer , Noah Benedict
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Mathematical Sciences, Bozeman, MT, USA, Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA, Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
ANO 2018
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Field Methods
ISSN 1525-822X
E-ISSN 1552-3969
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/1525822x18781756
CITAÇÕES 4
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 5926789c989c73f06b88927de19918d3

Resumo

The most widely used formal approach to culture, the cultural consensus theory (CCT) of Romney, Weller, and Batchelder, originally relied on a priori definitions of cultural groups to map their unity and diversity. Retaining key features of classical CCT, we provide techniques to identify two or more cultural subgroups in a sample, whether those groups are known in advance or not. Our method helps CCT practitioners connect to contemporary approaches to culture in anthropology and related disciplines, which emphasize complexity. We suggest that our method provides reasonable and easily implementable approximations of cultural unity and diversity within a sample. In pursuing these matters, we contribute to other ongoing efforts to bring CCT closer to contemporary theorizing on cultural multiplicity, thus rendering CCT potentially more useful to a wider range of practicing social scientists.

Ferramentas