Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparison of Three Designs for List-style Open-ended Questions in Web Surveys

Bibliographic Data

ID2407682
AuthorsTanja Kunz (0000-0001-8460-2583, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, corresponding author), Katharina Meitinger (0000-0001-8160-556X, Utrecht University)
Year2022
Volume34
Issue4
Pages303-317
Publication date2022-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCAM (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x221115831
OpenAlexW4298146332
LanguageEN
References cited18

Although list-style open-ended questions generally help us gain deeper insights into respondents' thoughts, opinions, and behaviors, the quality of responses is often compromised. We tested a dynamic and a follow-up design to motivate respondents to give higher quality responses than with a static design, but without overburdening them. Our results showed that a follow-up design achieved longer responses with more themes and theme areas than a static design. In contrast, the dynamic design produced the shortest answers with the fewest themes and theme areas. No differences in item nonresponse and only minor differences in additional response burden were found among the three list-style designs. Our study shows that design features and timing are crucial to clarify the desired response format and motivate respondents to give high-quality answers to list-style open-ended questions

Contrast (vision · Design elements and principles · Quality (philosophy · Style (visual arts · Theme (computing · Web survey · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet

    Marcel Das, Peter Ester et al.•Social and Behavioral Research…•2018

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Survey Errors and Survey Costs

    Open Access•Robert M Groves•Survey errors and survey costs•1989

  • The Influence of the Answer Box Size on Item Nonresponse to Open-Ended Questions in a Web Survey

    Open Access•Cornelia Zuell, Natalja Menold et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2014

  • Thinking Inside the Box

    Open Access•Alicia Hofelich Mohr, Andrew Sell et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2015

  • The Influence of Topic Interest and Interactive Probing on Responses to Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Jennifer L Holland, Leah Melani Christian et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2008

  • Item non-response in open-ended questions

    Open Access•Evi Scholz, Cornelia Zuell•Social Science Research•2012

  • Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels

    Mario Callegaro, Charles Disogra•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys

    Jolene D Smyth, Don A Dillman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • The Open and Closed Question

    Howard Schuman, Stanley Presser•American Sociological Review•1979

  • Visual Design and Cognition in List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Probing

    Open Access•Katharina Meitinger, Tanja Kunz•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae