The Pyrrhic Victory of Game Studies

Assessing the Past, Present, and Future of Interdisciplinary Game Research

Bibliographic Data

ID2409652
AuthorsSebastian Deterding (0000-0003-0033-2104, University of York, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume12
Issue6
Pages521-543
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGames and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1555-4120 • E-ISSN: 1555-4139
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1555412016665067
OpenAlexW2516525038
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited42

Although game studies are widely viewed as an interdisciplinary field, it is unclear how interdisciplinary they actually are. In response, this article reads scientometric data and game studies editorials, handbooks, and introductions through the lens of interdisciplinarity studies to assess game studies' status as an interdiscipline. It argues that game studies show drivers and hurdles typical for interdisciplines. Yet instead of establishing themselves as the broad umbrella interdiscipline of digital game research, they are becoming one narrow cultural studies multidiscipline within the growing and diversifying field of game research and education. Researchers from fields like human-computer interaction or communication are abandoning game studies venues in favor of disciplinary ones-ironically thanks to game studies legitimizing game research. This article suggests that a design orientation and cross-disciplinary boundary objects such as middle range theories could help to broaden, deepen, and secure future interdisciplinary game research

Discipline · Engineering ethics · Field (mathematics · Game art design · Game design · Game design document · Game Developer · Game mechanics · Game studies · Media studies · Multimedia · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Victory · Computer Science · Digital Games and Media · Educational Games and Gamification · Engineering · Mathematics · Wikis in Education and Collaboration