Social Impact Ex-Post Evaluation Protocol
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2411368 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aitor Gómez (0000-0001-8994-9885), Manuel De León (0000-0002-8028-2348), Anabel Sánchez-Plaza, Anabel Sánchez (0000-0001-6676-5119), Marta Soler-Gallart (0000-0003-4494-4508) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069221133231 |
| OpenAlex | W4312409400 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Measuring the societal impact of research has become a key issue in scientific research worldwide. Most competitive research funding agencies demand societal impact in research proposals. We must not only bring science closer to the public, but also make it improve the condition in which the science is found. But how can we measure the societal impact of a research once it has been completed? Through this article we present the Social Impact ex-post Evaluation Protocol (SIEP), a proposal of a tool to gather and measure the social impact of research. It is based on the qualitative work developed in the framework of NET4IMPACT, a Research Network on the Social Impact of Science. The work was developed applying communicative methodology, comparing across disciplines, and culminating in the establishment of a tool that can help in the measurement of societal impact from a great diversity of scientific areas
Diversity (politics · Impact assessment · Management science · Political science · Protocol (science · Public relations · Social impact · Social research · Social science · Societal impact of nanotechnology · Sociology · Work (physics · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Engineering · Higher Education and Sustainability · Inclusive Education and Diversity · Public Administration
A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research
Europe must fund social sciences
Africa Sustainable Development Report 2017
Effective strategies that enhance the social impact of social sciences and humanities research
Resistance to and Transformations of Gender-Based Violence in Spanish Universities
Communicative Daily Life Stories
Qualitative Inquiry
Exclusionary and Transformative Dimensions
Successful Communicative Focus Groups With Teenagers and Young People
Romantic Love and Gender Violence
Communicative Daily Life Stories and Focus Groups
From Research to Policy
Communicative Methodology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |