Comparison of Telephone and In-Person Interview Modalities
Duration, Richness, and Costs in the Context of Exploring Determinants of Equitable Access to Community Health Services in Meru, Kenya
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2411870 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luke N Allen (0000-0003-2750-3575), Sarah Karanja (0000-0001-5275-5534), Malebogo Tlhajoane (0000-0002-0601-5516), John Tlhakenelo, David Macleod (0000-0002-2371-5709), Andrew Bastawrous (0000-0001-8179-556X) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069241312012 |
| OpenAlex | W4407560872 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
Background Our research team conducted phenomenological interviews in Kenya with people who were not able to access community eye health services, aiming to explore the barriers and ideas for potential service modifications. We conducted an embedded study that compared in-person and telephone interview modalities in terms of time requirements, costs, and data richness. Methods A team of six interviewers conducted 31 in-person interviews and 31 telephone interviews using the same recruitment strategy, topic guide, and analytic matrix for each interview. We compared the mean duration; mean number of themes reported by each participant; total number of themes reported; interviewer rating of perceived richness; interviewer rating of perceived ease of building rapport; number of days taken by the team to complete all interviews; and all costs associated with conducting the interviews in each modality. Results In-person interviews were 44% more expensive and took 60% longer to complete than our telephone interviews (requiring 5 days and 3 days respectively). The average in-person interview lasted 110 seconds longer than the average telephone interview ( p = .05) and generated more words and themes. However, the full set of interviews from both approaches identified similar numbers of barriers ( p = .14) and the same number of solutions ( p = .03). Interviewers universally felt that the in-person approach was associated with better rapport and higher quality data ( p = .01). Triangulation of themes revealed good agreement, with 88% of all solutions occurring in both sets of interviews, and no areas of thematic dissonance. Conclusions The in-person approach required more time and financial resources, but generated more words and themes per person, and was perceived to afford richer data by interviewers. However, this additional richness did not translate into a greater number of themes that our team can act upon to improve services
Context (archaeology · Duration (music · Geography · Interview · Medical education · Modalities · Qualitative research · Semi-structured interview · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Telephone interview · Thematic analysis · Computer Science · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Applied Psychology · Social Psychology
Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis
What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies
Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?
The Research Act
Viés de desejabilidade social na pesquisa qualitativa em saúde
Conducting In-Depth Interviews via Mobile Phone with Persons with Common Mental Disorders and Multimorbidity
Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies
Beyond the In-Person Interview? How Interview Quality Varies Across In-person, Telephone, and Skype Interviews
Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups
Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys
Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviews
Am I not answering your questions properly?' Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews
Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |