Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Brent Daniel Mittelstadt , Patrick Allo , Mariarosaria Taddeo , Sandra Wachter , Luciano Floridi
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Oxford School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, UK
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Big Data & Society
ISSN 2053-9517
E-ISSN 2053-9517
DOI 10.1177/2053951716679679
CITAÇÕES 44
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 aa1c1516c8c6495ba5f5595a01b60ea0

Resumo

In information societies, operations, decisions and choices previously left to humans are increasingly delegated to algorithms, which may advise, if not decide, about how data should be interpreted and what actions should be taken as a result. More and more often, algorithms mediate social processes, business transactions, governmental decisions, and how we perceive, understand, and interact among ourselves and with the environment. Gaps between the design and operation of algorithms and our understanding of their ethical implications can have severe consequences affecting individuals as well as groups and whole societies. This paper makes three contributions to clarify the ethical importance of algorithmic mediation. It provides a prescriptive map to organise the debate. It reviews the current discussion of ethical aspects of algorithms. And it assesses the available literature in order to identify areas requiring further work to develop the ethics of algorithms.

Ferramentas