Get out to deliberate (Gotd)
Door-to-door canvassing to improve civic engagement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24138402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katy Tabero (0000-0003-0091-3136, University of Southampton), Zohreh Khoban (0000-0002-6526-0642, University of Southampton), Paolo Spada (0000-0002-7050-2079, University of Southampton), Rafael Mestre (0000-0002-2460-4234, University of Southampton), Matt Ryan (0000-0002-8693-5063, University of Southampton) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-27 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1475676526101637 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Several decades of experimentation have found that ‘Get-Out-the-Vote’ (GOTV) campaigns can effectively increase voter turnout. Yet, little has been said about the ability of similar-style campaigns to encourage participation in other types of civic engagement, such as citizens’ assemblies, which require much higher levels of commitment. Furthermore, although studies have found general support for citizens’ assemblies, willingness to participate is higher amongst those already more politically engaged and with higher levels of education, presenting a challenge to claims surrounding legitimacy and representation. In this article, we conduct a GOTV-style field experiment, complemented by a doorstep survey, to increase and understand perspectives towards registration for the 2023 Southampton Citizens’ Climate Assembly. We find that canvassing can be an effective method for increasing registration, including from under-represented groups. However, there are considerable barriers to participation, particularly the level of commitment, personal interest, and concerns about impact, which limit recruitment efforts.
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors
Citizens' Assemblies for Referendums and Constitutional Reforms
Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness
Invitation Phone Calls Increase Attendance at Civic Meetings
Is Door-to-Door Canvassing Effective in Europe? Evidence from a Meta-study across Six European Countries
Must Feminists Give up on Liberal Democracy
Increasing and Diversifying Turnout in Non-electoral Participation
Public support for deliberative citizens' assemblies selected through sortition
Explaining non‐participation in deliberative mini‐publics
Procedural legitimacy and political trust
Reviving Randomness for Political Rationality
Sortition as Anti‐Corruption
A Get-Out-the-Vote Experiment on the World’s Largest Participatory Budgeting Vote in Brazil
The dissatisfied and the engaged
Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout
Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |