Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘Stewardship’, not ‘ownership’

From communities of proficient non-natives and historical lingua francas to AI and LLM-generated written English

Bibliographic Data

ID24139732
AuthorsNikola Dobrić (0000-0002-2410-4934, University of Klagenfurt, corresponding author), Maria Kuteeva (0000-0003-2942-1426, Stockholm University)
Year2026
Volume25
Issue2
Publication date2026-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4555 • E-ISSN: 1573-1863
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10993-026-09798-2
OpenAlexW7203767382
LanguageEN
References cited45

This article examines stewardship as a mechanism of supra-regional language management under conditions of extensive non-native use, drawing on historical cases of Sanskrit, Latin and Classical Arabic. Unlike models grounded in native-speaker “ownership” and state-centred language policy, stewardship emerges when proficient non-native users collectively sustain a lingua franca across long spans of time and wide—often discontinuous—spaces. In these historical cases, learned communities managed stability and controlled innovation in predominantly written high registers, preserving the languages as cosmopolitan media long after any substantial native-speaker base had receded or disappeared. The article argues that supra-regional written registers of English are now undergoing a conceptually comparable—but technologically distinct—shift in its own supra-regional management. Central is an erosion of control by traditional norm-enforcing institutions and a reconfiguration of norm provision through text-generative AI: widely used LLM-based tools diffuse standard-like formulations at scale and, crucially, do so from training inputs that include large volumes of both native and non-native English. The article concludes by framing AI-mediated norm provision as an emerging stewardship regime for global English and by outlining the empirical questions this hypothesis raises: whose usage is amplified, how institutional actors respond and what this implies for the future politics of English standards.

Applied linguistics · Framing (construction) · Language planning · Lingua franca · Norm (philosophy) · Politics · Sociolinguistics · Stewardship (theology) · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Multilingual Education and Policy · Second Language Learning and Teaching

  • Authority in Language

    James Milroy, Lesley Milroy•Authority in language•2012

  • The Ecology of Language Evolution

    Open Access•Salikoko S Mufwene•Ecology of Language Evolution•2001

  • Literacy as Translingual Practice

    Suresh Canagarajah•Literacy As Translingual Practice•2013

  • Language Policy and Language Planning

    Open Access•Sue Wright•Language Policy and Language…•2004

  • Communities of Practice

    Open Access•Etienne Wenger•Communities of Practice•1998

  • World English

    Janina Brutt-Griffler•World English•2002

  • Translanguaging

    Open Access•Oreto García, Ofelia García et al.•Translanguaging•2014

  • Language Policy

    Elana Shohamy•Language Policy•2006

  • SLA and the Study of Equitable Multilingualism

    Open Access•Lourdes Ortega•Modern Language Journal•2019

  • Native-speakerism

    Adrian Holliday•ELT Journal•2006

  • Bilingualism and the Latin Language

    Open Access•J N Adams•Bilingualism and the Latin Language•2003

  • Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place

    Open Access•Maria Kuteeva, Marta Andersson•Applied Linguistics•2024

  • The English-Mediated European Cosmopolis as Proto-Federal Infrastructure

    Open Access•Nikola Dobrić•Journal of Language Identity &…•2026

  • Sanskrit, Classical Arabic, Latin and now English – a case of a special kind of lingua franca use and status

    Open Access•Nikola Dobrić, Martin Korenjak et al.•Journal of Historical Sociolinguist…•2025

  • The coloniality of native speakerism

    Open Access•Ruanni Tupas•Asian Englishes•2022

  • English as a ‘global’ language in a geopolitically changing world – the telling patterns observable in historical precedents

    Open Access•Nikola Dobrić, Martin Korenjak et al.•Asian Englishes•2026

  • International English in the global village

    Open Access•Marko Modiano•English Today•1999

  • Lives of the Great Languages

    Karla Mallette•Lives of the Great Languages•2021

  • Beyond Greek

    Denis Feeney•Beyond Greek•2016

  • The English Cosmopolis

    Open Access•Nikola Dobrić•English Today•2026

  • The Language of the Gods in the World of Men

    Sheldon Pollock•Language of the Gods in the World…•2006

  • Global Englishes and language teaching

    Open Access•Heath Rose, Jaqueline Mckinley et al.•Language Teaching•2021

  • Closing A Conceptual Gap

    Open Access•Barbara Seidlhofer•International Journal of Applied…•2001

  • The Ownership of English

    H G Widdowson•TESOL Quarterly•1994

  • Study Quality in the Age of AI

    Open Access•Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Hassan Nejadghanbar et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2026

  • Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca

    Open Access•Barbara Seidlhofer•Annual Review of Applied…•2004

  • Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization

    Open Access•James Milroy•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2001

  • AI, power and sociolinguistics

    Open Access•Ico Maly•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2024

  • The Dynamics of New Englishes

    Open Access•Edgar W Schneider•Language•2003

  • TheNative Speaker

    Alan Davies•The Native Speaker•2003

  • New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes

    Open Access•Edgar W Schneider•World Englishes•2014

  • Eil, Esl, Efl

    Open Access•Henry G Widdowson•World Englishes•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae