‘Stewardship’, not ‘ownership’
From communities of proficient non-natives and historical lingua francas to AI and LLM-generated written English
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24139732 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nikola Dobrić (0000-0002-2410-4934, University of Klagenfurt, corresponding author), Maria Kuteeva (0000-0003-2942-1426, Stockholm University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1568-4555 • E-ISSN: 1573-1863 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10993-026-09798-2 |
| OpenAlex | W7203767382 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
This article examines stewardship as a mechanism of supra-regional language management under conditions of extensive non-native use, drawing on historical cases of Sanskrit, Latin and Classical Arabic. Unlike models grounded in native-speaker “ownership” and state-centred language policy, stewardship emerges when proficient non-native users collectively sustain a lingua franca across long spans of time and wide—often discontinuous—spaces. In these historical cases, learned communities managed stability and controlled innovation in predominantly written high registers, preserving the languages as cosmopolitan media long after any substantial native-speaker base had receded or disappeared. The article argues that supra-regional written registers of English are now undergoing a conceptually comparable—but technologically distinct—shift in its own supra-regional management. Central is an erosion of control by traditional norm-enforcing institutions and a reconfiguration of norm provision through text-generative AI: widely used LLM-based tools diffuse standard-like formulations at scale and, crucially, do so from training inputs that include large volumes of both native and non-native English. The article concludes by framing AI-mediated norm provision as an emerging stewardship regime for global English and by outlining the empirical questions this hypothesis raises: whose usage is amplified, how institutional actors respond and what this implies for the future politics of English standards.
Applied linguistics · Framing (construction) · Language planning · Lingua franca · Norm (philosophy) · Politics · Sociolinguistics · Stewardship (theology) · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Multilingual Education and Policy · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Authority in Language
The Ecology of Language Evolution
Literacy as Translingual Practice
Language Policy and Language Planning
Communities of Practice
World English
Translanguaging
Language Policy
SLA and the Study of Equitable Multilingualism
Native-speakerism
Bilingualism and the Latin Language
Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place
The English-Mediated European Cosmopolis as Proto-Federal Infrastructure
Sanskrit, Classical Arabic, Latin and now English – a case of a special kind of lingua franca use and status
The coloniality of native speakerism
English as a ‘global’ language in a geopolitically changing world – the telling patterns observable in historical precedents
International English in the global village
Lives of the Great Languages
Beyond Greek
The English Cosmopolis
The Language of the Gods in the World of Men
Global Englishes and language teaching
Closing A Conceptual Gap
The Ownership of English
Study Quality in the Age of AI
Research Perspectives on Teaching English as a Lingua Franca
Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization
AI, power and sociolinguistics
The Dynamics of New Englishes
TheNative Speaker
New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes
Eil, Esl, Efl
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |