“From under the hatches”
Reflections on dark sousveillance and resisting carceral-care surveillance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24140232 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Victoria Copeland (0000-0002-2444-5413, Department of Social Welfare, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517261481730 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
As automated decision-making tools and surveillance become increasingly embedded within systems of care, there is an urgent need for analytical frameworks and resistance practices created and informed by those most impacted. Inspired by Dark Sousveillance , this commentary draws on a collaborative community research project with two grassroots organizations in Los Angeles to demonstrate how oppositional knowledge can be used to analyze and resist algorithmic harm and the surveillance of Black communities. The commentary introduces an analytical framework grounded in knowledge produced “from under the hatches” to examine how predictive risk assessment tools, data-sharing practices, and systems of carceral-care surveillance operate across interlocking domains of power. Rather than centering technical solutions to algorithmic harm, the framework highlights how communal study and lived experience are essential for analyzing and resisting the continued expansion of racializing carceral-care surveillance.
Misogynoir Transformed
Algorithms of Oppression
“It's the Only System We've Got”
Cheating Welfare
Decarcerating Disability
Administrative Burdens in Child Welfare Systems
Policing through ‘paperwork’
Surveillance and Child Protection
Family Policing and the Carceral State
Algorithmic reparation
Getting Eyes in the Home
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |