Bar Chart Looking Glass
How White Men Make Sense of Evidence Showing Intersectional Inequality in Their Profession
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24140673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E A Cech (0000-0001-6913-7150, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Corey Moss-Pech (0000-0003-1239-1531, Florida State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23780231261474205 |
| OpenAlex | W7204495791 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 80 |
Addressing long-standing inequalities in professions demands that professionals, especially those with power and privilege, believe that inequalities exist and are motivated to act. What promotes this inequality recognition? Focusing on an illustrative case of white, able-bodied, heterosexual men (WAHM) in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, this study asks: How do these intersectionally advantaged professionals make sense of data illustrating inequality in their fields? Do they accept it as evidence of inequality or dismiss its legitimacy? What logics do they employ in their explanations? In interviews, we present a representative sample of 101 WAHM professionals with graphical evidence published in a generalist science journal showing patterns of intersectional inequality in respect and salary within U.S. STEM professions. A third of WAHM dismissed the epistemic legitimacy of one or both of these patterns outright. Even when WAHM acknowledged that group differences exist, only a third explained both respect and salary gaps as outcomes of systemic disadvantage. But seeing the data was transformative for some. We discuss the implications of these findings for equity advancement in STEM and beyond; they reveal that recognizing systemic group differences is not the same as recognizing inequalities in professions and that evidence alone will not convince advantaged professionals that inequalities exist.
Bar chart · Converse · Equity (law) · Inequality · Intersectionality · Legitimacy · Power (physics) · Salary · White (mutation) · Career Development and Diversity · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Gender Diversity and Inequality
Equity in Science
Misconceiving Merit
An Inclusive Academy
The Enigma of Diversity
In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening
STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes
Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM
Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder
A Theory of System Justification
Sex differences in perceptions of structural barriers and career advancement factors among academic staff in Spanish universities
Color‐blind or racially conscious? How college science faculty make sense of racial/ethnic underrepresentation in STEM
Selling diversity to white men
The Science and Art of Interviewing
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory
Organizational and Personal Dimensions in Diversity Climate
Scientific Careers
A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature
Gendered Pathways to the Job Offer
STEM Immigration and U.S. STEM Workforce Development at the Intersections of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Immigration Status
Job Tenure and Gendered Perception of Workplace Challenges in Gendered Organizations
Inequality Is a Problem of Inference
What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis
Recognizing chilliness
Epistemic exclusion
Perceived workplace racial discrimination and its correlates
Valuing diversity
How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM
Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace
Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering
Allies against Sexism
Epistemic injustice and hegemonic ordeal in management and organization studies
Whites' perceptions of discrimination against Blacks
Perception of Subtle Racism
Separate Remains Unequal
Deciding Together as Faculty
Education and Understanding Structural Causes for Group Inequalities
Perceiving personal discrimination
Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system
Racial Discrimination, Interpretation, and Legitimation at Work
Between- and Within-Occupation Inequality
Race, Religion, and Beliefs about Racial Inequality
Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education
Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality
African American, Hispanic, and White Beliefs about Black/White Inequality, 1977-2004
Broadening the Science of Broadening Participation in STEM Through Critical Mixed Methodologies and Intersectionality Frameworks
Constraints into Preferences
A Theory of Racialized Organizations
Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing
Perceiving Glass Ceilings? Meritocratic versus Structural Explanations of Gender Inequality among Women in Science and Technology
Science Graduate Students' Reports of Discrimination Due to Gender, Race, and Religion
Strategies Men Use to Negotiate Family and Science
Seeing Isn't Always Believing
Escalator or Step Stool? Gendered Labor and Token Processes in Tech Work
Gender As a Social Structure
New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination
Organizational Approaches to Inequality
Social Inequality in High Tech
Constructing Allyship and the Persistence of Inequality
Lowering Their Meritocratic Blinders
Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers
Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |