Dark Participation' Without Representation
A Structural Approach to Journalism's Social Media Crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2414505 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kaitlin C Miller (0000-0003-1368-0351, University of Alabama, corresponding author), Jacob L Nelson (0000-0003-2714-9924, Arizona State University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Media + Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2056-3051 • E-ISSN: 2056-3051 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20563051221129156 |
| OpenAlex | W4307409206 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 29 |
Social media platforms have become an integral part of journalistic work. These tools allow journalists to pursue stronger, more intimate connections with their audiences, to cultivate their own professional identities or 'brands,' and to advocate for improved working conditions within their organizations. Yet, social media platforms have also created new risks and challenges for journalists, most notably in the form of dark participation, which refers to negative, selfish or even deeply sinister forms of online audience engagement. Although scholars have devoted considerable effort to exploring how this harassment unfolds and how it impacts journalists who face it, there is less research investigating the implications of this harassment for the future of journalism and its relationship with the public. To address this, this research uses interviews with a diverse group of 37 US journalists to propose larger structural changes to newsroom leadership and social media policy creation. The interview data suggest that newsroom leadership must become more diverse so that newsroom policy is assembled by a group of people that is representative of its staff-as well as the public at large. The authors conclude by observing that 'dark participation' is not unique to journalism alone, and by discussing the implications of our findings for communication stakeholders invested in overcoming the current, global climate of populism that frequently results in hate, harassment, and hostility within social media
Harassment · Hostility · Journalism · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Populism · Public relations · Social media · Social science · Sociology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Diversity and Equity from Below
Medios Nativos Digitales y Sus Comunidades Virtuales
Mídias sociais e as disrupções da democracia
Hidden in plain sight- Audience engagement in China’s data journalism
Aspirational Metajournalism
Be cautious or be cancelled
Unprepared for Reality
Prepared for Precarity
Shooting the Messenger? Harassment and Hate Speech Directed at Journalists on Social Media
It Became No Man’s Land”
Allies, Antagonists, and Apathetic
Let’s Not Tank the Reputation of This Organization.” How Newsroom Social Media Policies Exacerbate Journalism’s Labor Crisis
What I miss most
Broadcasters’ Management of Social Media Platforms
The Marketplace of Attention
Personal Branding on Twitter
TrollBusters
“I Realized It Was About Them … Not Me”
Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News
Online Harassment and Its Implications for the Journalist–Audience Relationship
Hostility Toward the Press
Dark Participation
Not Their Fault, but Their Problem”
The Digitization of Harassment
They Go for Gender First”
Trolling Journalists and the Risks of Digital Publicity
Reciprocal Journalism
Harassment’s Toll on Democracy
We wouldn’t say it to their faces”
How journalists engage in branding on Twitter
Tapping Into a New Stream of (Personal) Data
I Always Watched Eyewitness News Just to See Your Beautiful Smile
You really have to have a thick skin
Newspaper journalism in crisis
Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon
Disconnection
A Personalized Self-image
The Complexity of Intersectionality
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |