Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Vernon Gayle , Paul S. Lambert , Roxanne Connelly
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK, University of Stirling, Centre for Education Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Methodological Innovations
ISSN 2059-7991
E-ISSN 2059-7991
DOI 10.1177/2059799116638003
CITAÇÕES 23
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 92fafb8d0a5f0e2b5e793a9e3126bd95

Resumo

This article is a review of issues associated with measuring occupations and using occupation-based socio-economic classifications in social science research. The review is orientated towards researchers who undertake secondary analysis of large-scale micro-level social science datasets. This article begins with an outline of how to handle raw occupational information. This is followed by an introduction to the two main approaches to measuring occupations and a third lesser known but intellectually innovative approach. The three approaches are social class schemes, social stratification scales and the microclass approach. International comparisons are briefly described and a discussion of intersectionality with other key variables such as age and gender is provided. We are careful to emphasise that this article does not advocate the uncritical adoption of any one particular occupation-based socio-economic measure over and above other alternatives. Rather, we are advocating that researchers should choose from the portfolio of existing socio-economic measures in an informed and empirically defensible way, and we strongly advocate undertaking sensitivity analyses. We conclude that researchers should always use existing socio-economic measures that have agreed on and well-documented standards. We strongly advise researchers not to develop their own measures without strong justification nor to use existing measures in an un-prescribed or ad hoc manner.

Ferramentas