Contingency, cost, and a fracking ban: Extending sociological research with the contingent valuation method
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA |
ANO | 2018 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Methodological Innovations |
ISSN | 2059-7991 |
E-ISSN | 2059-7991 |
EDITORA | SAGE Publications Inc. |
DOI | 10.1177/2059799118790741 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
68fd7fc39528d6137fddbd3d4e500140
|
Resumo
Documenting patterns of environmental concerns has been a core effort of environmental sociology since the founding of the sub-discipline. Environmental economists, on the other hand, are pre-occupied with the valuation of non-market goods like ecosystems services and environmental policy. In this article, we argue that sociologists should cautiously embrace non-market valuation methods, particularly the contingent valuation method. We provide a motivating empirical example by considering the case of support for a fracking ban among residents of Colorado, USA. Our analysis suggests that Colorado residents' support for a fracking ban is somewhat contingent upon the costs created by said ban. We then conclude by discussing how sociologists might extend research on non-market valuation with sociological insights.