Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deciding to decide

Agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID24201900
AuthorsH W Perry (0000-0003-2947-8668)
Year1991
Pages316
Publication date1991-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueDeciding to decide (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherHarvard University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
Open LibraryOL1535978M
ISBN9780674194427
LanguageEN
Citations received115

Certiorari · Judicial process · Research · supreme court · united states · United States. Supreme Court

  • The Role of Law Clerks in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Agenda-Setting Process

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Christina L Boyd•American Politics Research•2012

  • Avoiding Constitutional Cases

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser•American Politics Research•2011

  • The Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Strategies in the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chris Nicholson, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•American Politics Research•2008

  • Amici Curiae in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Wendy L Martinek•American Politics Research•2006

  • Separate Opinion Writing On The United States Courts Of Appeals

    Open Access•Virginia A Hettinger, Stefanie A Lindquist et al.•American Politics Research•2003

  • Sound the Alarm? Judicial Decisions Regarding Publication and Dissent

    Open Access•Morgan L W Hazelton, Morgan Hazelton et al.•American Politics Research•2016

  • Choices in Context

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels•American Politics Research•2011

  • In-Depth Qualitative Research and the Study of American Political Institutions

    James M Curry•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

  • State Solicitors General, Appellate Expertise, and State Success Before the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Patrick C Wohlfarth•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court

    Gregory A Caldeira, G Caldeira•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1999

  • The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Solicitor General and the United…•2012

  • Impeachment E Responsabilidade Jurídica

    Open Access•Ranieri L Resende•Revista Culturas Jurídicas•2021

  • Interest Group Participation, Competition, and Conflict in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Thomas H Hammond et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Pamela C Corley, Pamela Corley•Concurring Opinion Writing on the…•2010

  • Haves" Versus "Have Nots" in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Friends of the Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Deciding Not to Decide

    Open Access•Robert J Hume•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary

    Open Access•Susan B Haire, Stefanie A Lindquist et al.•Law & Society Review•2003

  • Understanding Judicial Hierarchy

    Open Access•Kevin M Scott•Law & Society Review•2006

  • The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Stefanie A Lindquist, David E Klein et al.•Law & Society Review•2006

  • The Tenth Justice? Consequences of Politicization in the Solicitor General's Office

    Patrick C Wohlfarth•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Getting in the Door

    Open Access•Kenneth Goldstein, Kenneth M Goldstein•PS Political Science & Politics•2002

  • Repercussão geral das questões constitucionais

    Horival Marques De Freitas Junior, Horival Marques de Freitas•2016

  • Let's Talk About Same Sex

    Open Access•Stephanie K Boy•Advances in Social Work•2010

  • Independence and interdependence

    Open Access•Christian List, Adrian Vermeule•Rationality and Society•2014

  • Reevaluating the Implications of Decision-Making Models

    Open Access•Ali S Masood, Donald R Songer•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • The Downstream Effects of Certiorari

    Open Access•Sahar Abi-Hassan, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Political Jurisprudence and the Role of the Supreme Court

    Matthew S Brogdon•American Political Thought•2017

  • What To Do About Atheoretic Lags

    Open Access•Skyler J Cranmer, Sue Cranmer et al.•Political Science Research and…•2017

  • As pautas do Supremo

    Open Access•Tailma Venceslau, Tailma Santana Venceslau•Política & Sociedade•2023

  • Signals from a politicized bar

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery•Constitutional Political Economy•2019

  • Empirical Legal Scholarship in Law Reviews

    Shari Seidman Diamond, Pam Mueller•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • I Respectfully Dissent

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Drew Noble Lanier•Review of Policy Research•2004

  • Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Alexander Tahk et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Pushing Constitutional Limits in the U.S. States

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Eve M Ringsmuth et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Looking Back to Move Forward

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Alternative Models of Appeal Mobilization in Judicial Hierarchies

    Burton M Atkins•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Marshalling the Court

    Paul J Wahlbeck, James F Spriggs et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Inviting Congressional Action

    Lori Hausegger, Lawrence Baum•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Not the Whole Story

    Donald R Songer, Stefanie A Lindquist•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Whistleblowing and Compliance in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Open Access•Deborah Beim, Alexander V Hirsch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Signals from the Tenth Justice

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Brian Kamoie et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • The Public and the Supreme Court

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Signaling and Counter‐Signaling in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Open Access•Deborah Beim, Alexander V Hirsch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • The outcome-prediction strategy in cases denied certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Saul Brenner, Joseph M Whitmeyer et al.•Public Choice•2007

  • Uncertainty, polarization, and proposal incentives under quadratic voting

    Open Access•John W Patty, Elizabeth Maggie Penn•Public Choice•2017

  • Presidential Power over Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Joseph M Whitmeyer•Public Choice•2006

  • Justice as Checks and Balances

    Open Access•Edgar Franco-Vivanco•World Politics•2021

  • How institutions structure judicial behaviour

    Lee Epstein•University of Toronto Law Journal•2019

  • The Development of a Legal Rule

    Open Access•Paul J Wahlbeck•Law & Society Review•1998

  • The Impact of Supreme Court Activity on the Judicial Agenda

    Open Access•Deborah Rice, Douglas Rice•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience

    Open Access•Andrea Mcatee, Kevin T Mcguire•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Measuring Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt•Law & Society Review•2016

  • Repeat Players in the Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood et al.•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Setting a Judicial Agenda

    Micheal W Giles, Thomas G Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Ducking Trouble

    Anna Harvey, Barry Friedman•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda

    Vanessa A Baird•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Learning in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Deborah Beim•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Lower Court Influence on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content

    Pamela C Corley, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • A Theory of Opinion Writing in a Political Hierarchy

    Tom S Clark, Clifford J Carrubba•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Supreme Court and Percolation in the Lower Courts

    Tom S Clark, Jonathan P Kastellec•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • The Consistency of Judicial Choice

    Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Forging of Judicial Autonomy

    Justin Crowe•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers

    Robert L Boucher, Robert L Boucher Robert L Boucher et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Interplay of Ideological Diversity, Dissents, and Discretionary Review in the Judicial Hierarchy

    Deborah Beim, Jonathan P Kastellec•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Beyond Principals and Agents

    Open Access•Samuel Kenney, Sally J Kenney•Comparative Political Studies•2000

  • Expanding the ‘Dialogue’ Debate

    Open Access•Matthew A Hennigar, Matthew Hennigar•Canadian Journal of Political…•2004

  • Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Precedent and Doctrine in a Complicated World

    Open Access•Steven Callander, Tom S Clark•American Political Science Review•2017

  • Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    Open Access•Charles R Epp•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Gregory A Caldeira•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Rule Creation in a Political Hierarchy

    Open Access•Clifford J Carrubba, Tom S Clark•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Issues, Agendas, and Decision Making on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Barbara Palmer•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire, Barbara Palmer•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Herbert M Kritzer•American Political Science Review•2002

  • The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine

    Jeffrey R Lax•Annual Review of Political Science•2011

  • Mayors, Partisanship, and Redistribution

    Open Access•Katherine Levine Einstein, David M Glick•Urban Affairs Review•2016

  • Membership Change and Voting Change

    Open Access•Thomas R Hensley, Christopher E Smith•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • U.S. Government Litigation Strategies in the Federal Appellate Courts

    Open Access•Christopher J W Zorn, Christopher Zorn•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Issue Fluidity and Agenda Setting on the Warren Court

    Open Access•Barbara Palmer•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jennifer Bowie, Jennifer Barnes Bowie et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Getting Attention

    Open Access•C Scott Peters•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Institutional Foundations of the President’s Issue Agenda

    Open Access•Jeff Yates, Andrew Whitford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Amici Curiae and Strategies for Gaining Access to the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Dissensual Decision Making

    Open Access•Marcus E Hendershot, Mark S Hurwitz et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Assessing the Impact of State Judicial Structures on Citizen Litigiousness

    Open Access•Jeff Yates, Holley Tankersley et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Consider the Source (and the Message)

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • What Judges Want

    Lawrence Baum•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Trends

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Tristan M Hightower et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • The Psychological Origins of a Constitutional Revolution

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases

    Logan Strother•Political Communication•2017

  • Interviewing Australia's Senior Judiciary

    Jason L Pierce•Australian Journal of Political…•2002

Unique citing works115
Citations per year3,48
Citation span1993 - 2025 (33)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 106
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae