EUrope’s changing territory
The new pact on migration and asylum, externalization, and the common European asylum system
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24211774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ettore Asoni (0000-0003-2468-5107) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 177 |
| Pages | 104844 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geoforum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104844 |
| OpenAlex | W7214436178 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Recent years have marked a turning point for the externalization of border and migration control within the EU. Italy’s new policy of extraterritorial detention in Albania, together with the legislative proposal to establish return hubs in third countries, signal a qualitative shift from previous practices. EU Member States are no longer content with relying on bilateral partnerships to outsource border control to non-European countries. Instead, the new phase entails the incorporation of externalization strategies directly into the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). This transition, however, threatens the stability of the CEAS’ traditional territorial architecture. The emerging strategies are grounded in a conception of territory that departs from its conventional Westphalian definition, generating legal and political frictions when integrated into the CEAS. Such tensions are visible in the ongoing political debates and legal challenges surrounding the new measures. The article approaches these developments as a geographic problem, focusing on the tension between the contrasting definitions of territory currently competing across the CEAS’ legal framework. In doing so, it engages with recent geographic scholarship on externalization, highlighting the growing instability of the territorial order underpinning both the CEAS and the EU, and its difficulty in accommodating externalization policies without generating internal contradictions.
Albania · border externalization · Common European Asylum System · EU external relations · migration control · Territoriality · third countries · Westphalian statehood · European Law and Migration · European Politics and Security · Gender and Women's Rights
Bordering Asylum
The symbolic meaning of international mobility
Imaginings of Space in Immigration Law
Closure’ at Manus Island and carceral expansion in the open air prison
Crimmigrant’ bodies and bona fide travelers
Introduction
Good neighbours make good fences’
Exclusion Through Imperio
On Territory as Relationship and Law as Territory
The state as container
Riding Routes and Itinerant Borders
Biopolitical Violence and Waiting
A Chronotope of Containment Development
The EU ‐Turkey‐'deal
Indirect migration management
Research methods for legal geography
Law, Property, and the Geography of Violence
Exploring Europe’s external migration policy mix
Territory, Terrain, and Human Rights
Turkey’s governance of irregular migration at European Union borders
Containment beyond detention
Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept
Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies
Afterword
Beyond presentism in border externalization studies
Spaces and territorialities on the Sino-Burmese boundary
Land, terrain, territory
Rethinking Territory
The territorial trap
Jurisdiction and Scale
Security and Immigration
Interventions on the state of sovereignty at the border
The enforcement archipelago
Legal Geography
Immigrant Il-Legality
Borderwork in the Expanded EU-African Borderlands
The UK Border Security Continuum
Europe as Borderland
The entangled geographies of responsibility
The rugged border
Decentering the Study of Migration Governance in the Mediterranean
The 'external dimension' of EU immigration and asylum policy
Formal informality' in EU external migration governance
The EC hotspot approach in Greece
Introduction
Remote control of migration
Reorienting EU Border Externalization Studies
The Ground without Foundation
Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality
Colonial Law and Cultural Difference
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |