Making green rent gaps
Housing price impacts of the 606/Bloomingdale Trail in Chicago
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24214108 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew D Wilson (0000-0002-6569-4950), Elham Pilegar (0009-0000-1007-0035) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 179 |
| Pages | 107626 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-2751 • E-ISSN: 1873-6084 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cities.2026.107626 |
| OpenAlex | W7214887640 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Urban greening initiatives present a paradox: they often improve environmental quality and public amenities intensifying real estate speculation and displacement pressures. This study examines these dynamics through Chicago's 606 Trail (Bloomingdale Trail), a 2.7-mile elevated park opened in 2015. We conceptualize and empirically measure a policy–market temporal mismatch: the gap between rapid housing market responses to infrastructure investment signals and the timing of municipal housing preservation measures. Using residential property transactions from 2009 to 2024, we estimate hedonic price models with spatial econometric specifications across eight project phases and five distance buffers extending 1.5 miles from the trail. Results show that a statistically significant proximity premium emerged during the 2011–2013 recommitment-to-construction period, when the project returned to active development and full funding was secured, well before construction or opening, and persisted long after completion. In the immediate post-opening period, properties within 0.25 miles sold for 29% more than comparable properties 1–1.5 miles away. Although Chicago aldermen attempted a demolition-fee ordinance in 2017, the first enacted housing preservation measure — a demolition moratorium covering the trail area — was not adopted until 2020, nine years after the initial market response. We argue that such temporal mismatches reflect structural constraints on the speed of municipal protective action under prevailing urban governance arrangements, including informational asymmetries that allow markets to capitalize anticipated amenities immediately, institutional configurations in which constructing new protective arrangements takes longer than executing development transactions, and political economy dynamics in which pro-growth coalitions mobilize more rapidly than housing preservation coalitions.
housing prices · land value capture · trail development · Urban green space · Housing Market and Economics · Urban Planning and Governance · Urban Planning and Valuation
Green gentrification in European and North American cities
Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People
Eco-gentrification and who benefits from urban green amenities
Locating the green space paradox
From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism
Exploring green gentrification in 28 global North cities
How well do we know green gentrification? A systematic review of the methods
Symbolism, Collective Identity, and Community Development
Contested Spaces
Property price effects of green interventions in cities
A social assessment of urban parkland
Anticipation and post-construction impact of a metro extension on residential values
Tearing the City Down
New scholarly pathways on green gentrification
Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods
Sustainable for whom? Green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the Atlanta Beltline
Extracting Value from the City
Large Redevelopment Initiatives, Housing Values and Gentrification
The changing state of gentrification
Ideas as coalition magnets
New Globalism, New Urbanism
Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice
Gentrification, Discourse, and the Body
Zoned Bohemian
Racial Inequity in Green Infrastructure and Gentrification
The Settlement Experience of Latinos in Chicago
"Wiped Out by the "Greenwave
Green Grabbing
| Highly cited | No |
|---|