Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond the civic–ethnic distinction

Moral community and the sociology of nationhood as an analytical framework

Bibliographic Data

ID24216381
AuthorsTürkay Salim Nefes (0000-0002-0294-2064, The Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain)
Year2026
Publication date2026-09-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Research Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/13607804261486198
OpenAlexW7214804882
LanguageEN
References cited12

The civic–ethnic distinction has long structured debates on nationalism, yet its value has been questioned. This article revisits that framework through a comparison of Ernest Renan’s What is a Nation? and Ziya Gökalp’s What is Turkism? Despite their distinct contexts, both reject race and geography as foundations of nationhood and contest language and religion as straightforward ‘natural’ bases. Their key divergence lies in how national cohesion is generated and sustained. The article contributes to critiques of the civic–ethnic distinction by developing an original comparative framework for analysing nationhood, moral community and inclusion beyond classificatory labels, opening new lines of inquiry into the mechanisms through which nationhood is conceptualised and reproduced.

Ernest Renan · inclusion · language and nation · moral community · National Unity · Nationalism · nationhood · race and nation · religion and nation · Ziya Gökalp · Cultural History and Identity Formation · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Nationalism and Cultural Identity

  • The Sociological Foundations of Turkish Nationalism

    Türkay Salim Nefes•Journal of Balkan and Near…•2018

  • Problems With Sociology Education in Turkey on Its 100th Anniversary

    Open Access•Aytül Kasapoğlu•SAGE Open•2016

  • The Relationship between Perceived Security Threats and Negative Descriptions of Armenians in Turkish Politics (1946–1960)

    Open Access•Türkay Salim Nefes•Nationalities Papers•2022

  • Demographic engineering in the late Ottoman empire and the Armenians

    Nesim Şeker•Middle Eastern Studies•2007

  • Towards a Decolonial and Anti‐Racist Analysis of the Nation‐State and Nationalism

    Open Access•Simina Dragoș•Sociology Compass•2024

  • TheBalkanWars and the rise of the reactionary modernist utopia in youngTurk thought and the journalTürk Yurdu[Turkish Homeland]

    Open Access•Ümit Kurt, Doğan Gürpınar•Nations and Nationalism•2015

  • The myth of the civic nation

    Bernard Yack•Critical Review•1996

  • Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism

    Open Access•Stephen Shulman•Comparative Political Studies•2002

  • Not So Civic

    Yael Tamir, Yael Yuli Tamir•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • Ziya Gökalp's adaptation of Emile Durkheim's sociology in his formulation of the modern Turkish nation

    Open Access•Türkay Salim Nefes•International Sociology•2013

  • On the Roles of Institutions and Agency in Nationalism and the Relations between Them

    Open Access•Benedikte Brincker•Sociology•2020

  • Decolonizing the civic/ethnic binary

    Open Access•M Tinsley•Current Sociology•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae