Converging knowledges in the maternity ward in Ghana
An ethnographic study of care for women with pre-eclampsia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24216464 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bregje Christina De Kok (0000-0002-1294-2092, University of Amsterdam), Sylvia Esther Gyan (0000-0001-8517-4162, University of Ghana), Linda Lucy Yevoo (0009-0002-4256-3541, Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon), Koiwah Koi-Larbi (Action on Preeclampsia Ghana), Daniel Arhinful (0000-0002-5496-3289, Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture Health & Sexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-1058 • E-ISSN: 1464-5351 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13691058.2026.2737187 |
| PMID | 42803320 |
| OpenAlex | W7214579554 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Efforts to improve maternal health rely heavily on biomedicine. Anthropologists, often US-based, have critiqued biomedicine for being 'authoritative knowledge' that shifts power from women to medical experts, and colonises and de-values other birth traditions. However, this ethnographic study of care for pre-eclampsia patients in Ghanaian hospitals shows how embodied, religious, and Indigenous knowledges co-shape biomedical care. Through a form of health care bricolage, health practitioners negotiate different knowledge traditions and the interests of different knowledge bearers, including pastors and husbands. The classic concept of 'authoritative knowledge' appears to be a Euro-American framework requiring contextualisation. We must also avoid romantisation. Religious and Indigenous healing traditions may serve patriarchal and commercial interests rather than those of women. We can learn from practitioners on the ground how to have inclusive conversations and negotiations that promote reproductive health and freedom, including the freedom to use life-saving medical interventions. This paper contributes to re-worlding reproduction by re-centring relational and spiritual onto-epistemologies and complicating Euro-American ideals of shared decision-making between doctors and individual patients.
authoritative knowledge · biomedical knowledge · indigenous knowledge · knowledge negotiation · obstetric care · Patriarchy · Preeclampsia · religious healing · Reproductive health · shared decision-making · women's autonomy · Ethics and bioethics in healthcare · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
The Logic of Care
Faith Healing and Womenn's Reproductive Health
Reproductive Justice
Co-creation of a toolkit to assist risk communication and clinical decision-making in severe preeclampsia
Suffering and its professional transformation
The Traps of International Scripts
Power Differences’ and ‘the Power of Difference’
Health providers as bricoleurs
Beyond the coloniser’s model of the world
Meeting the Universe Halfway
Prayer and health-seeking beliefs in Ghana
Therapy Management
Articulate(d) bodies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|