Strategic health policy and health system resilience in protracted crisis settings

Policymaker perspectives from Yemen

Bibliographic Data

ID24217199
AuthorsDalia Hyzam (0000-0001-9960-096X, Akkon University), Taha Al-Mahbashi (0000-0002-5985-1833, Al-Razi University), Fekri Dureab (0000-0002-8414-4129, University of Doha for Science and Technology), Timo Ulrichs (0000-0002-8123-6714, Akkon University)
Year2026
Volume19
Issue1
Pages2734009-2734009
Publication date2026-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Health Action (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1654-9716 • E-ISSN: 1654-9880
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/16549716.2026.2734009
PMID42789303
OpenAlexW7214347193
LanguageEN
References cited15

BACKGROUND: Health system resilience is often described through the World Health Organization building blocks, yet in protracted crises it depends on whether governance, financing, workforce, information systems, service delivery, and accountability can convert crisis response into institutional reform. OBJECTIVE(S): This study examines how far Yemen's health system responses to prolonged conflict, economic decline, disease outbreaks, and COVID-19 progressed beyond absorptive and adaptive resilience toward transformative resilience, and how strategic health policy across the building blocks shaped this transition. METHODS: We conducted 30 in-depth interviews with national and subnational policymakers and health leaders in Yemen between May and July 2025. Data were analysed in ATLAS.ti 25 using framework-informed thematic analysis that combined a priori categories from the World Health Organization health system building blocks and resilience capacities with inductively developed empirical codes. RESULTS: Yemen demonstrated externally buffered absorptive capacity sufficient to prevent complete system collapse, together with uneven and localised adaptation through crisis committees, donor-supported financing, temporary workforce mobilisation, intensified surveillance, oxygen and isolation capacity, and referral workarounds. However, these responses were largely reactive, donor-dependent, and unevenly institutionalised. Transformative resilience remained constrained by fragmented authority, under-protected recurrent financing, workforce instability, weak data-to-decision pathways, limited referral governance, and the absence of formal learning-to-reform mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Yemen's experience shows that resilience in protracted crisis settings should be judged not only by the survival of repeated shocks, but by whether absorptive and adaptive gains are converted into institutional capability through strategic policy alignment across the health system.

adaptive resilience · Conflict · COVID-19 pandemic response · donor dependence · Health care financing · health governance · health information systems · health system resilience · healthcare workers · institutional reform · protracted crises · transformative resilience · WHO health system building blocks · Yemen · Health and Conflict Studies · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Healthcare Systems and Reforms

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access