Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do Professions Remain Analytically Distinct From Non‐Professional Occupations?

Bibliographic Data

ID24217416
AuthorsMeaghan Furlano (0009-0006-3259-7309, Department of Sociology Western University London Canada)
Year2026
Volume63
Issue4
Pagese70056-e70056
Publication date2026-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-6171 • E-ISSN: 1755-618X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cars.70056
PMID42806473
OpenAlexW7214710765
LanguageEN
References cited47

Recent debates in sociological literature have questioned whether ‘professions’ and ‘non‐professional occupations’ remain analytically distinct concepts. This article engages with longstanding scholarship on work, occupations and professions to address this question. Drawing primarily on the work of Adams (2018), Saks (2021) and their associated neo‐Weberian approaches, I argue that professions are socially constructed and historically, geographically and temporally contingent. As such, the contemporary macrostructural conditions (re)shaping professional work in the Anglo‐American context—most notably emerging subjective forms of precariousness—should not be interpreted as signalling the demise of professions. Rather, they represent the latest iteration of professional work and its ongoing effort to maintain hegemony amid shifting economic structures. Although professional and non‐professional occupations appear to be converging in some of the respects traditionally separating them, I argue that professions remain analytically distinct from non‐professions. This distinction persists because professionals continue to benefit from the economic and symbolic advantages they have secured through state legitimation, social closure, and the enduring cultural representations of themselves and their work that promote the ideological ‘common‐senseness’ of their elevated social and economic status. The article therefore concludes that professions are not experiencing a ‘crisis’ but are instead entering a new phase of their ongoing reconstruction.

Precarity · professional activity · professional crisis · Professions · social closure · social construction of professions · state legitimation · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Education, sociology, and vocational training · Management and Organizational Studies

  • The Rise of Professionalism

    Magali Sarfatti Larson•Rise of Professionalism•1977

  • The System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  • Labor and Monopoly Capital

    Harry Braverman•Monthly Review•1974

  • Approaches to Class Analysis

    Open Access•Erik Olin Wright•Approaches to Class Analysis•2005

  • Defining a Profession

    Open Access•Mike Saks•Professions and Professionalism•2012

  • Spillover of Vaccine Hesitancy into Adult Covid-19 and Influenza

    Open Access•Victoria Zhang, Peiyao Zhu et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • It’s the Lack of Structure that’s Causing the Problem”

    Open Access•Kim M Shuey, Catherine Gordon et al.•Social Currents•2017

  • Profession

    Open Access•T L Adams•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2010

  • Affirmative action and employment equity in the professions

    Open Access•Brenda L Beagan, Kaitlin R Sibbald et al.•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2024

  • Under the cloak of professionalism

    Lilach Marom•Race Ethnicity and Education•2018

  • Rethinking Inclusion

    Open Access•Swethaa Ballakrishnen, Swethaa S Ballakrishnen•Law & Social Inquiry•2023

  • Neo-Weberianism, Professional Formation and the State

    Open Access•Mike Saks, T L Adams•Professions and Professionalism•2019

  • Globalisation and Social Class

    John H Goldthorpe•West European Politics•2002

  • Neo-Weberianism and changing state-profession relations

    Open Access•T L Adams, Mike Saks•Sociologia Problemas e Práticas•1970

  • Lords of the Dance

    Open Access•W Richard Scott•Organization Studies•2008

  • Precarious Work, Insecure Workers

    Open Access•A L Kalleberg•American Sociological Review•2009

  • Neo-Taylorism at Work

    Martha Crowley, Daniel Tope et al.•Social Problems•2010

  • Who Says Artificial Intelligence Is Stealing Our Jobs

    Open Access•Eric Dahlin•Socius Sociological Research for…•2024

  • Wage Theft and the Struggle over the Working Day in Hospitality Work

    Open Access•Matt Cole, Mark Stuart et al.•Work Employment and Society•2024

  • Why Artificial Intelligence Will Not Outsmart Complex Knowledge Work

    Open Access•Lene Pettersen•Work Employment and Society•2019

  • The Fearful and Anxious Professional

    Open Access•Scott M Allan, James Faulconbridge et al.•Work Employment and Society•2019

  • In, Against and Beyond Precarity

    Open Access•Giorgio Alberti, Gabriella Alberti et al.•Work Employment and Society•2018

  • Sociology of professions

    Open Access•T L Adams•Work Employment and Society•2015

  • Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies

    Open Access•Joan Acker•Gender & Society•1990

  • Sexual Harassment in Organizational Context

    Open Access•Lindsey Joyce Chamberlain, Martha Crowley et al.•Work and Occupations•2008

  • Symbolic Power

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Critique of Anthropology•1979

  • Can't Live with 'Em; Can't Live without 'Em

    Open Access•Sharon C Bolton, Daniel Muzio•Sociology•2007

  • Analyzing the Professions

    Mike Saks•Comparative Sociology•2010

  • Income Inequality

    Leslie Mccall, Christine Percheski•Annual Review of Sociology•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae