Do Professions Remain Analytically Distinct From Non‐Professional Occupations?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24217416 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meaghan Furlano (0009-0006-3259-7309, Department of Sociology Western University London Canada) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | e70056-e70056 |
| Publication date | 2026-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-6171 • E-ISSN: 1755-618X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cars.70056 |
| PMID | 42806473 |
| OpenAlex | W7214710765 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
Recent debates in sociological literature have questioned whether ‘professions’ and ‘non‐professional occupations’ remain analytically distinct concepts. This article engages with longstanding scholarship on work, occupations and professions to address this question. Drawing primarily on the work of Adams (2018), Saks (2021) and their associated neo‐Weberian approaches, I argue that professions are socially constructed and historically, geographically and temporally contingent. As such, the contemporary macrostructural conditions (re)shaping professional work in the Anglo‐American context—most notably emerging subjective forms of precariousness—should not be interpreted as signalling the demise of professions. Rather, they represent the latest iteration of professional work and its ongoing effort to maintain hegemony amid shifting economic structures. Although professional and non‐professional occupations appear to be converging in some of the respects traditionally separating them, I argue that professions remain analytically distinct from non‐professions. This distinction persists because professionals continue to benefit from the economic and symbolic advantages they have secured through state legitimation, social closure, and the enduring cultural representations of themselves and their work that promote the ideological ‘common‐senseness’ of their elevated social and economic status. The article therefore concludes that professions are not experiencing a ‘crisis’ but are instead entering a new phase of their ongoing reconstruction.
Precarity · professional activity · professional crisis · Professions · social closure · social construction of professions · state legitimation · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Education, sociology, and vocational training · Management and Organizational Studies
The Rise of Professionalism
The System of Professions
Labor and Monopoly Capital
Approaches to Class Analysis
Defining a Profession
Spillover of Vaccine Hesitancy into Adult Covid-19 and Influenza
It’s the Lack of Structure that’s Causing the Problem”
Profession
Affirmative action and employment equity in the professions
Under the cloak of professionalism
Rethinking Inclusion
Neo-Weberianism, Professional Formation and the State
Globalisation and Social Class
Neo-Weberianism and changing state-profession relations
Lords of the Dance
Precarious Work, Insecure Workers
Neo-Taylorism at Work
Who Says Artificial Intelligence Is Stealing Our Jobs
Wage Theft and the Struggle over the Working Day in Hospitality Work
Why Artificial Intelligence Will Not Outsmart Complex Knowledge Work
The Fearful and Anxious Professional
In, Against and Beyond Precarity
Sociology of professions
Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies
Sexual Harassment in Organizational Context
Symbolic Power
Can't Live with 'Em; Can't Live without 'Em
Analyzing the Professions
Income Inequality
| Highly cited | No |
|---|