Strengthening global mental health research through engagement with structural injustice theories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24217837 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wietse A Tol (0000-0003-2216-0526, University of Copenhagen), Andrea Bidoli (0000-0003-3835-9513, University of Copenhagen), Maria Marti Castaner (University of Copenhagen), Ezio Di Nucci (0000-0002-5734-6622, University of Copenhagen), Stella Evangelidou (0000-0002-7107-3229, Barcelona Institute for Global Health), David Nieuwe Weme (0000-0001-6225-1954, Amref Health Africa), Deepali Pavagadhi (The MHPSS Collaborative), Ruth M H Peters (0000-0002-7842-3121, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Jane Brandt Sørensen (0000-0002-1702-280X, University of Copenhagen), Nawaraj Upadhaya (University of Copenhagen) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2054-4251 • E-ISSN: 2054-4251 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/gmh.2026.10293 |
| OpenAlex | W7214760619 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
The field of global mental health (GMH) is in transition. Following its emergence in the mid-2000s, the field is currently grappling with critiques concerning the presumed universality of its concepts and approaches; the focus on treatments rather than addressing social determinants of mental health; and a lack of equity between actors in the Global North and South. With the field at this junction, we describe three ways in which structural injustice (SI) theories can respond to calls for change within GMH. Following a brief discussion of key characteristics of SI theories, such as those put forward by Powers and Faden (2006, Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019, Structural Injustice: Power, Advantage, and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press) and Young (2011, Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press), we first discuss how they can contribute to GMH by strengthening often-called-for inter- and transdisciplinarity, using well-being as a boundary object or bridging concept. Second, we argue that SI theories can inform data collection and analysis by offering a theoretical lens for analyzing the role of social context in well-being. Third, we discuss the potential benefits of the normative dimensions of SI theory. Engagement with normative dimensions may assist in addressing unfair knowledge practices in GMH. In addition, attention to normative dimensions of SI theories may help to make GMH research more responsive to the deeper-rooted structural determinants of mental health and multi-sectoral strategies to remedy these. We posit that, in this time of transition, SI theories provide a versatile resource to engage in much-needed transformations in the field of GMH.
boundary objects · Global mental health · Interdisciplinarity · multisectoral approach · normative dimension · social determinants of mental health · Social justice · structural injustice · Transdisciplinarity · Well-being · Gender, Health, and Social Inequality · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Mental Health Treatment and Access
Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development Goals
Poverty and mental disorders
Epistemic injustice in academic global health
Poverty, depression, and anxiety
Closing the gap in a generation
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development
A Theory of Justice
Structural Injustice
Promoting Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration
Frantz Fanon in the Time of Mad Studies
What is Structural Injustice
Inverting the deficit model in global mental health
Sex Workers, Stigma, and Self-Image
Mental health and structural injustice
Addressing culture and context in humanitarian response
Developing an integrated intervention to address intimate partner violence and psychological distress in Congolese refugee women in Tanzania
Examining implementation of an intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in a refugee camp setting
Multilevel Determinants of Integrated Service Delivery for Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health in Humanitarian Settings
Universal mental health
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
Developing a logic model for youth mental health
Critical race theory as theoretical framework and analysis tool for population health research
This is Not a Boundary Object
The role played by social-ecological resilience as a method of integration in interdisciplinary research
Structural injustice
Contingent universality
Global Mental Health
Toward a new architecture for global mental health
Communal Violence and Child Psychosocial Well-being
| Highly cited | No |
|---|