University Students Say YES to Religious Freedom—But Under Which Conditions? Profiles of Support in Croatia and Italy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24217957 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Teuta Stipišić Marušić (0000-0003-0447-7095, Independent Researcher, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1169 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel17101169 |
| OpenAlex | W7220453816 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
This article examines whether support for religious freedom among university students in Croatia and Italy forms distinct profiles and which factors are associated with profile membership. Drawing on questionnaire data from university students in Croatia (N = 603) and Italy (N = 714), with 1170 complete cases included in the cluster analysis, K-means cluster analysis identified three profiles: Consistent Supporters (36.0%), Conditional Supporters (39.2%), and Restrictive Supporters (24.8%). Consistent Supporters combined strong endorsement of religious freedom with support for pluralism, recognition, and accommodation. Conditional Supporters endorsed religious freedom in positive absolute terms but combined this with the strongest assimilation orientation, weaker pluralism and recognition, and more selective institutional accommodation. Restrictive Supporters displayed the weakest support across most dimensions. Multinomial logistic regression showed that dominant Church favouritism and institutional religious privileging were associated with higher odds of both Conditional and Restrictive rather than Consistent membership. Croatian respondents, those with more right-wing political orientations, and those with weaker family religious socialization were also more likely to belong to both less-consistent profiles, whereas religious affiliation and self-rated religiosity were not independently significant in the final model. The findings demonstrate that support for religious freedom is multidimensional and may remain positive while becoming conditional in its public and institutional application.
assimilation · Croatia · Italy · Public opinion · Religiosity · religious accommodation · Religious freedom · Religious pluralism · religious recognition · right-wing political orientation · university students · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Education and Schools · Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Religioznost i stavovi prema imigrantima u Hrvatskoj
A Sociology of Religious Freedom
Nations and Citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States
Religious Pluralism
Across the Loop
Religion Within and Beyond Borders
One pope, two churches
Perceptions of the Functions of Religion and Attitude toward Religious Freedom
Religious Freedom in Theory and Practice
Social construction of religious freedom
Religious freedom
Religion and National Identity in Central and Eastern European Countries
A Struggle over Religious Rights? How Muslim Immigrants and Christian Natives View the Accommodation of Religion in Six European Countries
Religion, secularity, culture? Investigating Christian privilege in Western Europe
Territory and the divine
How State Support of Religion Shapes Attitudes Toward Muslim Immigrants
Strange Bedfellows? Attitudes toward Minority and Majority Religious Symbols in the Public Sphere
Supporting the Right to Wear Religious Symbols
Religious Deregulation
Measuring the Social Perception of Religious Freedom
Flexible Catholicism, Religion and the Church
Two Models of Political Secularism and Religious Freedom in Italy and Croatia
Social perception of religious freedom
The Judicialization of Religious Freedom
Managing Religion and the Judicialization of Religious Freedom
Presidential Address Origins and Consequences of Religious Freedoms
The Sociology of Religious Freedom
How the religious context affects the relationship between religiosity and attitudes towards immigration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |