Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estado, conflitos e construção da verdade no Brasil

As contribuições antropológicas de Roberto Kant de Lima

Bibliographic Data

ID24218167
AuthorsAna Paula Mendes De Miranda (0000-0003-1007-6714), Glaucia Maria Pontes Mouzinho (0009-0009-9003-3570), Kátia Sento Sé Mello (0000-0001-6683-4444)
Year2026
Publication date2026-09-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAntropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2179-7331 • E-ISSN: 2179-7331
PublisherPro Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pos Graduacao e Inovacao - UFF (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22409/antropolitica2026.v1.i1.a71798
OpenAlexW7214771993

This article critically examines the theoretical and methodological contributions of Roberto Kant de Lima to the consolidation and maturation of studies on the institutional administration of conflicts in Brazil. It highlights a fundamental epistemological shift proposed by the author: moving the analytical focus from normative and formal legal frameworks to the concrete, everyday practices of state agents. The study analyzes Kant de Lima’s pioneering trajectory in establishing public security and criminal justice as legitimate fields of anthropological inquiry, evaluating how this perspective reshapes research problem formulation, empirical fieldwork, and direct engagement with state institutions and public policies. Methodologically, the paper articulates the authors’ own empirical, professional, and institutional experiences in dialogue with Kant de Lima’s trajectory. It draws upon extensive ethnographic research involving comparative analyses and direct interlocution with state agencies, specifically referencing investigations centered on public space, police practices, the criminal justice system, and professional training in public security. The findings demonstrate that foundational categories such as “public order” and “legal truth” are far from being neutral or strictly normative guidelines. Instead, they operate as practical tools for classifying, processing, and managing social disputes, directly guiding selective state interventions and systematically reproducing legal and social inequalities. The article concludes that by prioritizing the study of the social construction of legal truth, the unequal distribution of credibility among citizens, and the localized, situated forms of conflict management, anthropology exposes the clear limitations of traditional normative and managerial approaches. Ultimately, this approach allows for a grounded understanding of the modern State—not as a monolithic entity, but as a dynamic set of institutional practices through which social conflicts are classified, truths are produced, and asymmetrical forms of recognition and citizenship are continuously reinforced.

anthropology of the state · Brazil · Citizenship · Criminal justice · legal inequality · police practice · Public order · Public security · Public space · state agents · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Criminal Justice and Penology · Policing Practices and Perceptions

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae