The Use of an Instrumental Language in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign/Second Language
An Experimental Study on Learner Perceptions and Academic Achievement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24218331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Öykü Mercan Çetin (0000-0003-3418-7953, Turkish Teaching Application and Research Center (TÖMER), Bartın University, 74110 Bartın, Türkiye) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 205 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages11100205 |
| OpenAlex | W7214948435 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
This convergent mixed-methods study investigates international learners’ perceptions and academic outcomes associated with the strategic use of English as an instrumental language in Turkish as a foreign/second language (TFL) instruction. Combining a survey of 113 multinational learners with a 6-week quasi-experimental intervention at the B2 level (experimental group, n = 10; control group, n = 12), the study contrasts self-reported skill priorities with objective post-test performance. Survey findings indicate that learners prioritized instrumental language support primarily for grammar (M = 3.01) and vocabulary (M = 2.97), while viewing it as least necessary for writing and speaking. Conversely, post-intervention achievement comparisons revealed a skill-specific paradox: while no statistically significant differences emerged in grammar, vocabulary, reading, listening, or writing, the experimental group achieved significantly higher speaking scores (p = 0.007, r = 0.67) than the target-language-only control group. Qualitative responses suggest that instrumental language availability may function less as a metalinguistic grammar tool and more as an affective scaffold and psychological safety net, consistent with the possibility that it mitigates anxiety and facilitates communicative engagement, although these affective mechanisms were not directly measured. These preliminary findings support a judicious, skill-differentiated pedagogical model wherein Turkish remains the primary instructional medium while strategic cross-lingual resources are preserved for cognitively complex and emotionally demanding speaking tasks.
academic performance · grammar instruction · instrumental language · learner perceptions · speaking skills · student anxiety · Turkish as a foreign language · Turkish as a second language · vocabulary teaching · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Second Language Learning and Teaching
First Language Use in Second and Foreign Language Learning
Pedagogical Translanguaging
Language, Bilingualism and Education
Pedagogical Translanguaging and Its Application to Language Classes
Using the First Language in the Classroom
Statistical notes for clinical researchers
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety
The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving
Adult Learners' Perceptions of the Incorporation of their L1 in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning
Pedagogical translanguaging in a multilingual English program in Canada
Own-language use in language teaching and learning
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |