Understanding value diversity in Finnish urban green spaces through Ipbes life frames
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24218987 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arpa Aishwarya (0009-0001-6854-6048, University of Turku), Nora Fagerholm (0000-0001-5020-0746, University of Turku), Raquel A Correia (0000-0001-7359-9091, University of Turku), Salla Eilola (0000-0002-6169-7310, University of Turku), Elisa Lähde (0000-0001-7932-9682, Aalto University), Michael Christie (0000-0002-8346-9140, Aberystwyth Business School, Aberystwyth University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ecosystems and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2639-5908 • E-ISSN: 2639-5916 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/26395916.2026.2731910 |
| OpenAlex | W7215875573 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
Cities globally are increasingly adopting nature-based solutions (NBS) to address climate change, mitigate biodiversity loss and enhance the quality of their living environments. However, urban green spaces (UGSs) hold different values for different groups and understanding this plurality is essential for planning that better supports local needs. Drawing on the IPBES Life Framework of Values – Living from, in, with and as nature – we explore the plurality of human-nature relationships across three Finnish cities: Turku, Tampere and Lappeenranta. Data were collected through a participatory, map-based survey completed by 2638 respondents, in which participants marked the locations of important nature places and assessed place-based values using Likert-scale statements, which were grouped into UGS profiles using K-means clustering. We employed Xtreme Gradient Boosting to identify how the social, ecological and technological characteristics of the UGSs are associated with each profile. We identified three distinctive UGS profiles: (1) Value Hotspot, where nature is significantly associated with diverse human values; (2) Low-perceived Value, where nature supports a limited range of values; (3) Experiential Value , where, in nature, cultural and personal experiences dominate. Social attributes – particularly UGS users’ activities and perceived importance of the UGS site – were the strongest predictors of profile membership, while ecological and technological characteristics showed limited influence. Findings demonstrate that value-based UGS profiles can offer planners nuanced insights into how urban nature contributes to users’ wellbeing. Integrating such a social value perspective into NBS planning can support more tailored and equitable live experiences to strengthen human-nature interconnectedness.
Finnish cities · human-nature relationship · Lappeenranta · nature-based solutions · participatory mapping · place-based values · Tampere · Turku · Urban green space · urban nature · user activity · value diversity · Well-being · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies · Urban Green Space and Health
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums
A new valuation school
Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS)
Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping
Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services
Introducing the “15-Minute City”
Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas
Diverse values of nature for sustainability
Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment
Landscape usage by recreationists is shaped by availability
Predicting context-sensitive urban green space quality to support urban green infrastructure planning
Restorative benefits of everyday green exercise
Associations of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status, accessibility, and quality of green spaces in Finnish urban regions
The Work that Work does
Socio‐demographic and geographical patterns in forest and park use
A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services
Designing Multifunctional Urban Green Spaces
Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas
Loving the mess
Making intrinsic values work; integrating intrinsic values of the more-than-human world through the Life Framework of Values
Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands
What are shared and social values of ecosystems
Outdoor recreation in various landscapes
A multi-layered values-based approach to advance social-ecological restoration
Planning nature-based solutions
Balancing landscape values and tourism choices
Ecosystem services between integration and economics imperialism
Using meaningful places as an indicator for sense of place in the management of social-ecological systems
| Highly cited | No |
|---|