The nonviolent legacies of rebel group origins
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24225176 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leo Bauer (0009-0004-9368-0742, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland , 3140 Tydings Hall, Preinkert Drive, College Park, MD 20742), Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham (0000-0002-7495-5972, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland , 3140 Tydings Hall, Preinkert Drive, College Park, MD 20742) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 309-320 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopres/xjaf024 |
| OpenAlex | W7134847819 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 66 |
Violent nonstate actors are increasingly seen as engaging in a diverse set of tactics, including nonviolent resistance. The use of nonviolent tactics by rebels complicates our understanding of rebels as primarily violent challengers to the state. What determines rebel groups’ use of nonviolent tactics? Extant research explains this tactical choice with mobilization potential and incentives that external actors create. We propose an alternative, organization-centric approach. Shifting the focus to the role of organizational legacies in tactics decisions, we argue that a rebel group’s tactical choice between violent and nonviolent contention is influenced by the type of parent organization from which it descends. Rebel groups inherit organizational capacities, behavioral norms, and personnel from parent organizations. These factors shape decisions on and norms with respect to the use of contentious tactics. We contend that groups with nonviolent parent organizations should be more likely to engage in nonviolent tactics, and should do so earlier in conflict, than those with other types of parent organizations, as they inherit organizational repertoires comprised of peaceful practices, norms against violence, and members socialized into nonviolent contentious politics. We test our argument using a quantitative research design with the newly updated SRDP dataset on the tactics of self-determination groups and the FORGE dataset on rebel group origins. We find that rebels with roots in organizations that used nonviolence are more likely to employ nonviolent tactics and use these tactics significantly earlier in wartime than rebels with other types of parent organizations.
behavioral norms · nonviolent resistance · organizational legacy · parent organizations · Military History and Strategy · Political Conflict and Governance · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Violent non-state actor ecology and the effects on counterinsurgency and statebuilding
Organizations as pivotal actors in conflict processes
Fading voices
Bidding for governance
War as women's work
The Commander's Dilemma
Organized Violence after Civil War
Rebel Governance in Civil War
International Press Coverage of East German Protest Events, 1989
The Quest for Socialist Utopia
Governing for Revolution
Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement
Rebelocracy
Ethnic Barriers to Civil Resistance
Levels of Analysis and Variation in Civil War Violence and Restraint
Rebel tactics and external public opinion
Introduction
Pro-Government Militias and the Repertoires of Illicit State Violence
Rebel group formation in Africa
Bombs and Banners
Democratizing civil disobedience
Why Civil Resistance Works
Rebel Diplomacy in Civil War
Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies
Repression, Dissent, and the Onset of Civil War
Labor Unions and Non-member Political Protest Mobilization in the United States
The Tactical Use of Civil Resistance by Rebel Groups
A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements
Rebel Territorial Control and Civilian Collective Action in Civil War
The Social Terrain of Rebel Held Territory
When Organizations Rebel
Unmasking Militants
Under the Roof of Rebels
Do Terrorists Win? Rebels' Use of Terrorism and Civil War Outcomes
Draining the Sea
Explaining External Support for Insurgent Groups
Militant and Rebel Organization(s)
Legacies of Resistance
Students in the Streets
Identifying Ideologues
The Cabinda Connection
Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834
Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset
Organizational legacies of violence
Your space or mine? Competition, control, and the spatial profile of militant violence against civilians
Militant Leadership and Terrorism in Armed Conflict
Gender ideologies and forms of contentious mobilization in the Middle East
Introducing the Strategies of Resistance Data Project
Introducing the Anatomy of Resistance Campaigns (ARC) dataset
Dynamics and factors of transition from armed struggle to nonviolent resistance
One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War
The perils of policy by p-value
The Phoenix Effect of State Repression
Organizing Rebellion
Effective for Whom? Ethnic Identity and Nonviolent Resistance
Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis
Validity and Systematicity of Newspaper Data in Event Analysis
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |