Securing support, avoiding harm? Civilian support, community organization, and rebel landmine use in Colombia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24225233 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henrique Garbino (0000-0002-2544-8683, Swedish Defence University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopres/xjag072 |
| OpenAlex | W7215104287 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
How do armed groups manage the trade-off between securing and accessing support from civilian populations and minimizing the risk of exposing them to violence? While rebels often depend on local communities, their proximity exposes civilians to significant risks. This article addresses this dilemma by examining the use of landmines by Colombian guerrilla groups. Although landmines are expected to offer an effective and low-cost means to offset asymmetries in civil wars, their indiscriminate nature threatens the very communities on which rebels rely. I argue that while rebels are more likely to lay minefields where they enjoy greater local support, they should also attempt to reduce risks to civilians in these areas, especially when faced with stronger resistance from local communities. Using cross-sectional, subnational data from Colombia's national mine action program, I show that guerrilla groups indeed laid more landmines in more supportive municipalities. However, while such support does not appear to correlate with restraint in landmine use, higher levels of community organization are associated with minefields being laid further from populated areas and with fewer civilian mine accidents. The findings contribute to research on civilian victimization, rebel governance, and restraint in wartime violence, with implications for mine clearance and civilian protection.
Asymmetric warfare · civilian protection · civilian support · civilian victimization · Colombian armed conflict · community organizations · demining · guerrilla movements · landmines · Mine action · mining accidents · rebel governance · Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance
Technology and civilian targeting in interstate war
The Commander's Dilemma
Rebel Governance in Civil War
Democracy and Displacement in Colombia's Civil War
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Resisting War
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Rebelocracy
Tying the Hands of Militants
Ideology and Violence in Civil Wars
It Wasn’t Because of Human Rights
Rebels against Mines? Legitimacy and Restraint on Landmine Use in the Philippines
Terrain ruggedness and land cover
Competing authorities and norms of restraint
Sexual violence along ethnic lines? Revisiting rebel-civilian ethnic ties and wartime sexual violence
Norms, non-combatants’ agency and restraint in jihadi violence in northern Mali
The International Committee of the Red Cross and support for civilian self-protection in Colombia
An Historical Review and Analysis of Colombian Guerrilla Movements
Peace Versus Profit
The Obama Administration and Targeting “War-Sustaining” Objects in Noninternational Armed Conflict
Places to Hide
Weakening the Enemy
Civil War as State-Making
Draining the Sea
Civilian Cooperation and Non-Cooperation with Non-State Armed Groups
Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset
Local elites, civil resistance, and the responsiveness of rebel governance in Côte d'Ivoire
Trapping Constituents or Winning Hearts and Minds? Rebel Strategies to Attain Constituent Support in Sri Lanka
Organized violence 1989-2023, and the prevalence of organized crime groups
When do ties bind? Foreign fighters, social embeddedness, and violence against civilians
Ideology in civil war
The commander's dilemma
International System and Technologies of Rebellion
| Highly cited | No |
|---|