Norms, not just interests
Public support for migrant rights protections in Europe–Africa cooperation on irregular migration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24226142 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lena Detlefsen (0000-0001-9894-2650, IfW – Kiel Institute for the World Economy), Martin Ruhs (0000-0001-6376-2414, European University Institute) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 16 |
| Pages | 4243-4280 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2026.2633669 |
| OpenAlex | W7141726161 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 29 |
This article analyses public support for stronger migrant rights protections in migration policy cooperation agreements between European and African countries. We theorise and explore how individuals’ preferences for stronger migrant rights protections in migration policy cooperation agreements vary with their perceived interests and broader normative commitments. Our empirical analysis draws on data collected from novel conjoint survey experiments that we conducted with quota-representative samples of the adult population in six European countries (the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden) and four African countries (Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, and Tunisia). We find a significant public preference across European and African countries for enhanced migrant rights protections, suggesting a strong and widespread norm in favour of migrant rights that holds across all the subgroups that we analyze. Our results also suggest that individuals’ perceived interests and broader normative commitments matter for the strength of their support for migrant rights, and they also influence their preferences for who, i.e., the respondent’s own country or the ‘other’ cooperation country, should provide the protection. We find only limited and partial evidence that including migrant rights protections increases individuals’ support for more restrictive elements of migration policy cooperation.
conjoint survey experiment · Irregular migration · migrant rights protection · normative commitment · perceived interest · European Law and Migration · Gender and Women's Rights · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
International norm dynamics in return and readmission
‘Human beings should not be deported’
Changing norms in EU return policy? A longitudinal analysis of commission documents on return
The power of human rights norms
The development of a U.S. and generalized ethnocentrism scale
Coming to Terms with the European Refugee Crisis
The effects of dehumanizing language on public opinion toward federal and “for-profit” immigrant detention
Migration Diplomacy in World Politics
Who cares about human rights? Public opinion about human rights foreign policy
How Issue Salience Explains the Rise of the Populist Right in Western Europe
The effect of perceived similarity and social proximity on the formation of prosocial preferences
A Rising Tide? The Salience of Immigration and the Rise of Anti‐Immigration Political Parties in Western Europe
Who cares what the people think? Public attitudes and refugee protection in Europe
Practising what you preach
What asylum and refugee policies do Europeans want? Evidence from a cross-national conjoint experiment
The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management
Human Rights Violations, Political Conditionality and Public Attitudes to Foreign Aid
Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
The conditional effects of the refugee crisis on immigration attitudes and nationalism
Do immigrants at bay keep the xenophobes away? Post-entry rights and public opposition to immigrant admission
The structure of foreign policy attitudes in transatlantic perspective
Numbers, Selectivity, and Rights
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration
The Hidden American Immigration Consensus
Easing the Heavy Hand
Performing secrecy
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |