Un/making protection
EU temporary protection and the governance of the Ukrainian displaced in Vienna in a global perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24226220 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Volha Biziukova (0009-0003-9912-7449, University of St Andrews), Ruslana Koziienko (0009-0005-2984-5124, Central European University), Ayşe Çaglar (0000-0001-7077-0439, University of Vienna) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2026-08-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2026.2695434 |
| OpenAlex | W7204703989 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 64 |
This article explores the reception of the Ukrainian displaced in Vienna following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, and the workings of temporary protection (TP). It analyses how response to the mass influx of displaced persons has been shaped jointly by the legacies of managing (forced) migration and the intersection of international, national, and regional governance. We situate the EU TP scheme within the wider historical and regional contexts of TP in the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Turkey, as well as in connection with the transformation of international protection. We demonstrate that TP represents part of the general erosion of international protection, the expanding discretion of nation-states, and the increasing politicisation of migration. We also trace how the shift to such ‘temporary’ frameworks shapes the contradictory statuses of displaced persons. We argue that this spread of temporary schemes, along with other emergency and exceptionality-driven tools, undergirds the resurgence of state power vis-à-vis both international and local governance. The expansion of state control is accompanied by the relegation of responsibility and the forgoing of rights-based guarantees. This trend defines today’s governance of the displaced and other populations through re-ordering of the regimes of labour, (im)mobility, and participation.
EU migration policy · Forced migration · international protection · labor regimes · mobility restrictions · refugee reception · refugee status · Russian invasion of Ukraine · state control · temporary protection · Vienna · European Law and Migration · Migration and Exile Studies · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
The End of the Refugee Cycle?
Urban governance of the displaced and emergency rules
Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment
Displacement in War-Torn Ukraine
Access to Asylum
The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration
In the Ruins of Neoliberalism
The Human Condition
The Human Condition
Transcending Boundaries
Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy
Political and Legal Responses to Human Mobility in South America in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. More Fuel for the Fire
Changes and Continuities in Austria's Coping with Refugee Crises over Three Centuries
The End of the Deterrence Paradigm? Future Directions for Global Refugee Policy
The Dilemmas of Solidarity of Civic Activists
Turkey’s asylum policies over the last century
Support for Ukrainian refugees after Russia's invasion of Ukraine
More Labels, Fewer Refugees
But we have to be realistic’
The Refugee Paradox During Wartime in Europe
Between opportunities and constraints
The arrival of Ukrainian refugees as an opportunity to advance migrant integration policy
Temporary Protection for Ukrainian Refugees in the Czech Republic and Poland
Mobility and legal infrastructure for Ukrainian refugees
The Cartagena Refugee Definition and Venezuelan Displacement in Latin America 1
Introduction
Limits to Harmonization
Temporary protection practice in Türkiye and in the EU
Progressive legislation but lukewarm policies
Temporary Protection of Refugees
Restrictive, liberal, selective or universal? A cross-national analysis of European countries’ policy response to forced migrants from Ukraine
From crisis to contradiction
Selective restrictions and liberalisations
Local responses in restrictive national policy contexts
Why do states discriminate between refugee groups? Understanding how Syrian and Ukrainian refugees were framed in Germany and Poland
Constrained Localism in an Authoritarian Environment
Privatising asylum
Value extraction through refugee carcerality
Reconstructing citizenship (again)
Reorganization of borders, migrant workers, and the coloniality of power
Authoritarian Neoliberalism
Normalising the Exceptional
Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies
The temporary turn in asylum
Experiencing forced migration
All is not yet lost here.' The role of aspirations and capabilities in migration projects of Ukrainian migrants in Poland
Ukrainian female refugees in Czechia after the Russian full-scale invasion
Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries
Citizenship beyond solidarity and belonging
The Sociology of Sociability
| Highly cited | No |
|---|