Drawing the borders of (non-)religious identity
The bureaucratisation of apostate refugee claims in the UK
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24226258 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucy Elizabeth Potter (0000-0002-4125-7908, University of York) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Community (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369183x.2026.2695432 |
| OpenAlex | W7167461528 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 34 |
Refugee Status Determination (RSD) processes in the United Kingdom (UK) function as a bordering mechanism within postcolonial governmentality. While scholarship has explored asylum bureaucracies and their organisational logics, credibility assessments, and decision-making, we know little about how these dynamics shape claims involving non-religion and how such complex identities become ‘bureaucratised’ through RSD. Drawing on analysis of international human rights law, national asylum policies, and narratives from refugees and human rights advocates (n = 34), this article examines how non-religious identities are included, excluded, and rendered ‘legible’ within the asylum system. To do so, I develop a novel analytical framework of the ‘coloniality of bureaucracy’ by combining decolonial perspectives with organisational sociology. This framework demonstrates, first, that contemporary asylum processes are fundamentally shaped by colonial histories embedded in decision-making hierarchies and organisational practices. Second, the bureaucratisation of identity serves as an exclusionary bordering strategy, where RSD processes construct hierarchical categories of belief that reproduce racialised, colonial imaginaries. By focusing on non-religion, an overlooked category of refugee status, this paper reveals how the administration of asylum is a site where (un)official knowledge is continuously (re)produced, demonstrating how bureaucratic procedures actively generate borders, inequalities, and forms of precarity within contemporary asylum systems.
Apostasy · asylum adjudication · asylum bureaucracy · asylum seekers · bordering · Decoloniality · non-religious identity · Precarity · refugee status determination · Religious identity · UK asylum policy · Migration and Exile Studies · Migration, Racism, and Human Rights · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Routledge Handbook of European Borderlands
Migrant Marginality
Asylum and Conversion from Islam to Christianity in Europe
Asylum and Nonreligion
Debating the colonial ascendant in decolonization of psychology– perspectives from Indian psychology
Inside Asylum Bureaucracy
The Borders of "Europe"
The inclusion of nonreligion in religion and human rights
Getting it Right
Becoming Non-Religious
Asylum as construction work
Conceptualization Shapes Practice
Countries you go, asylum adjudication you find.” Asylum appeals implementation arrangements, actors' discretion, and organizational practices
On the Receiving End
Reconceiving Refugee Law as Human Rights Protection
Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America
The Stigmatized Vernacular
The Colonised Self
"What Is Truth?" Negotiating Christian Convert Asylum Seekers' Credibility
The Silent Backdrop
Bringing order to the border
Who Is a Refugee? Political Subjectivity and the Categorisation of Somali Asylum Seekers in Sweden
Deciding on asylum dilemmas
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |