On the arguments for analyzing adverbs as PPs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24226905 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sascha Alexeyenko (University of Göttingen) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 260-277 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Adverbs and Particles at the Form-Meaning Interface (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/la.292.12ale |
| OpenAlex | W7140100466 |
| ISBN | 9789027233967 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
This paper argues that adverbs in English do not constitute a separate lexical class, neither are they positional variants of a single category together with adjectives, but rather they can and should be assimilated to PPs. In particular, the paper provides evidence from the complement-taking capacities of adverbs that the morpheme -ly is not a suffix but a nominal root, which forms the basis of the analysis of adverbs as PPs. Furthermore, it shows that the PP analysis of adverbs is also able to account for the facts that have been previously used as arguments for alternative analyses.
adverbs · English adverbs · lexical classes · prepositional phrases · Categorization, perception, and language · Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories
The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology
Adverb Placement
Transformational Grammar
Morphology
Empty Nouns
Some affixes are roots, others are heads
The VP within Process Nominals
Head-final effects and the nature of modification
The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs
One, Empty Nouns, and θ-Assignment
"Discontinuous" APs in English
A Course in Modern Linguistics
Suffix Ordering and Morphological Processing
Lexical Categories
| Highly cited | No |
|---|