Conversation Without Conversion
Evidence from Cross-Partisan Interactions on a Mobile Chat Platform
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24226971 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diana Jordan (0000-0001-5599-1890) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-15 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-9320 • E-ISSN: 1573-6687 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-026-10215-x |
| OpenAlex | W7222054430 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 62 |
Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics
The Rationalizing Voter
Why Deliberative Democracy?
Political Disagreement
Durably reducing transphobia
Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System
Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts
How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences
The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Perceived Responsiveness Increases Tolerance of Attitude Ambivalence and Enhances Intentions to Behave in an Open-Minded Manner
Beyond Deliberation
Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior
Hearing the Other Side
Politically knowledgeable ideologues believe they are less effective in political conversations
The contact hypothesis re-evaluated
Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation
Explicating Affordances
The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change
Unskilled and unaware of it
Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes
Narrative premiums in policy persuasion
Framing Persuasive Appeals
Predicting Deliberative Conversation
The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens
The Parties in Our Heads
(Mis)estimating Affective Polarization
Political Homophily in Social Relationships
Who’s Persuasive? Understanding Citizen-to-citizen Efforts to Change Minds
Cross-Partisan Conversation Reduced Affective Polarization for Republicans and Democrats Even after the Contentious 2020 Election
The Affective Tipping Point
Partisanship, Political Knowledge, and the Dunning‐Kruger Effect
The promise and peril of interpersonal political communication
When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning
Investigating Frame Strength
Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
Ripping Yarn
Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation
Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences
Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory
Entertaining Beliefs in Economic Mobility
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
The Incidental Pundit
Which Narrative Strategies Durably Reduce Prejudice? Evidence from Field and Survey Experiments Supporting the Efficacy of Perspective‐Getting
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives
What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation
It doesn’t hurt to ask
Culture tales
Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform
Is Telling Stories Good for Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation after 9/11
Reducing Exclusionary Attitudes through Interpersonal Conversation
Through the Grapevine
"Selecting Out of "Politics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|