Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What can the Independent Panel on Evidence for Action against Antimicrobial Resistance learn from Science Policy-Interfaces in Global Environmental Governance? A scoping review and conceptual framework

Bibliographic Data

ID24227387
AuthorsLauren J Wallace (0000-0002-4155-3758), Sahran Shafaque, Tracey Wagner-Rizvi (0000-0002-4582-8923), Isaac Weldon (0000-0002-2234-4117), Patrick Fafard (0000-0001-6234-3699), Geneviève Boily-Larouche, Steven J Hoffman (0000-0002-2064-3711), Mathieu J P Poirier, Arne Ruckert (0000-0001-5689-0629)
Year2026
Pages119954
Publication date2026-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119954
LanguageEN
References cited42
  • The Politics of Evidence (Open Access)

    Open Access•Justin Parkhurst•The Politics of Evidence (Open…•2016

  • Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy

    Simo Sarkki, Jari Niemelä et al.•Science and Public Policy•2014

  • Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021

    Open Access•Mohsen Naghavi, Stein Emil Vollset et al.•The Lancet•2024

  • Scoping studies

    Open Access•Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun et al.•Implementation Science•2010

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Managing participation across boundaries

    Open Access•Marta Ballesteros, Mark Dickey‐Collas et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • Understanding and evidencing a broader range of ‘successes’ that can occur at the interface of marine science and policy

    Open Access•Christopher Cvitanovic, Mary Mackay et al.•Marine Policy•2021

  • Remaking science-policy interfaces in the quest for effectiveness

    Matthew Cashmore, Tuija Hilding-Rydevik et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2020

  • Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making

    Open Access•Christine Kirchhoff, Maria Carmen Lemos et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2013

  • Intergovernmental or fully independent? Designing a scientific panel on evidence for action against antimicrobial resistance

    Open Access•Arne Ruckert, Steven J Hoffman et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Stakeholder participation in Ipbes

    Open Access•Cornelia B Krug, Eleanor J Sterling et al.•Ecosystems and People•2020

  • The 2019 review of Ipbes and future priorities

    Open Access•Anne-Sophie Stevance, Anne‐sophie Stevance et al.•Ecosystems and People•2020

  • Assessing Nature? The Genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)

    Open Access•Céline Granjou, Isabelle Mauz et al.•Science Technology and Society•2013

  • More than policy neutral

    Open Access•N Wagner, Simo Sarkki et al.•Earth System Governance•2024

  • Participation and inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Isabel Díaz‐reviriego, Esther Turnhout et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Enacting effective climate policy advice

    Anja Bauer, Michael Pregernig et al.•Evidence & Policy•2016

  • Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance

    Open Access•Thomas Koetz, Katharine N Farrell et al.•International Environmental…•2011

  • Enabling the Ipbes conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries

    Open Access•Ria Ann Dunkley, Susan Baker et al.•International Environmental…•2018

  • Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy

    Open Access•Christopher Cvitanovic, Rebecca Shellock et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Effectiveness factors and impacts on policymaking of science-policy interfaces in the environmental sustainability context

    Open Access•Niklas Wagner, Sara Velander et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy

    Open Access•Simo Sarkki, Rob Tinch et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Institutionalising reflexivity? Transformative learning and the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)

    Open Access•Maud Borie, Karin M Gustafsson et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • A new perspective on the work of boundary organisations

    Open Access•Moritz Latour, Frank Van Laerhoven•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Managing science-policy interfaces for impact

    Open Access•Simo Sarkki, Estelle Balian et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2019

  • Bumping against the boundary

    Open Access•Erik Löfmarck, R Lidskog•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • Boundary organizations in regime complexes

    Open Access•Jean-Frédéric Morin, Sélim Louafi et al.•Journal of International…•2016

  • Knowing like a global expert organization

    Open Access•Maud Borie, Martin Mahony et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Strengthening the science–policy interface in the climate migration field

    Open Access•Roman Hoffmann, Kira Vinke et al.•International Migration•2023

  • Science on Stage

    Stephen Hilgartner•Science on Stage•2000

  • Scoping studies

    Hilary Arksey, Lisa O’malley•International Journal of Social…•2005

  • Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science

    Open Access•David H Guston•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae