I Don’t ‘Like’ Malinowski, I Cite Malinowski
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24227609 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matti Eräsaari (0000-0002-7851-2685) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 222-229 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Suomen Antropologi Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0355-3930 • E-ISSN: 1799-8972 |
| Publisher | Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.30676/jfas.159859 |
| OpenAlex | W7148242551 |
| Language | EN |
The use of citation metrics has progressed to a point where a growing number of scholars are contemplating the possibility of using citation practices to enforce necessary changes on the academia - preferential citing practices, citation boycotts, and the like. Yet the academic citation is not an alienable token without consequential characteristics. In this essay, I suggest some lessons from the history of economic anthropology that may help to foreground those characteristics along with some potential implications should we scolars embrace the external assessors' commodity logic which allows one to reduce citations to value tokens.
academic citation · citation metrics · citation practices · Economic anthropology · history of economic anthropology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|