Conservation dilemmas
Xylella fastidiosa and the future(s) of olive farming
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24228264 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fabio Gatti (0000-0001-5165-693X) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10460-026-10970-x |
| OpenAlex | W7214164507 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 94 |
Over the past decade, the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa has profoundly transformed olive-growing landscapes in the southern Italian region of Apulia. Once characterized by ancient olive trees that sustained both rural livelihoods and cultural identities, the region is now caught between two competing trajectories: on the one hand, efforts to intensify and mechanize production to remain competitive in global olive oil markets; on the other hand, attempts to preserve centuries-old trees valued as cultural heritage and landscape elements. This paper conceptualizes this tension as a conservation dilemma: the structural conflict between sustaining olive trees simultaneously as livelihood-sustaining crops and as elements of biocultural landscapes. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research and the analysis of disease management policies and practices, the paper extends debates on conservation politics into productive agroecosystems and brings the political ecology of conservation into closer dialogue with critical agrarian studies and political agroecology. By showing that competing strategies for “saving” the olive trees enact different visions of agricultural futures, each supported—or undermined—by specific subsidy schemes, market forces, and labor regimes, the paper argues that the fate of Apulian olive trees depends less on technical solutions to the disease than on the political and economic conditions that determine which practices of care can be materially sustained. The paper concludes by reflecting on convivial conservation and a conservation basic income as potential frameworks for sustaining labor-intensive landscape-care practices beyond market-based solutions.
agricultural futures · agricultural subsidies · Apulia · biocultural landscapes · Cultural heritage · Disease management · labor regimes · landscape management · Olea europaea · olive cultivation · rural livelihoods · Xylella fastidiosa · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens · Urban and spatial planning
The New Peasantries
Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing
Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review
Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation
Epistemic diversity and the politics of knowledge in plant disease management
Xylella fastidiosa and the Olive Oil Crisis in Puglia
Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change
Autonomy as a politico‐economic concept
Plant disease detonators
Towards Convivial Conservation
The political ecology of human-wildlife conflict
The conceptual potential of ‘more‐than‐human care’
Conflict and conservation
Tourism, Real Estate Development and Depeasantisation in Latin America
Agriculture and the Generation Problem
The land sparing – land sharing controversy
Othering Pastoralists, State Violence, and the Remaking of Boundaries in Tanzania’s Militarised Wildlife Conservation Sector
The farmer as a landscape steward
Enlightened Mills
Violence and conservation
The CAP (Common Agricultural Policy)
Saving the Olive Trees? Ontological Politics and Plant Disease Governance in Apulia, Southern Italy
The agrarian question, past and present
Agrarian transition and the Agrarian question
Repeasantization and synergy between community-based tourism and family farming
The 'Critical Turn' in Tourism Studies
Accumulation by Conservation
Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century
Critical tourism studies
Roots of Distrust
Rural Out-Migration
Capitalism, nature, socialism a theoretical introduction∗
Challenging Agroecology-Promise and Pitfalls for Agrarian Studies
Surveying the agrarian question (part 2)
The political economy of agroecological transitions
Politically engaged, pluralist and internationalist
The political economy of agroecology
Agroecology as a territory in dispute
Differentiation
What is a land grab? Exploring green grabs, conservation, and private protected areas in southern Chile
Green Grabbing
Green pretexts
| Highly cited | No |
|---|