Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Farmer-led networks for redistributing power in pluralistic advisory systems

Two case studies from Ontario, Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID24228277
AuthorsBaran Karsak (0000-0003-1638-0741), Erin Nelson (0000-0002-7448-9588), Laura L Van Eerd, Sarah K Larsen, Heather White (0000-0002-0874-6259), Tori Waugh, Paige Allen
Year2026
Volume43
Issue2
Publication date2026-04-29
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10460-026-10893-7
OpenAlexW7159789139
LanguageEN
References cited53

agricultural commercialization · Agricultural extension · Democratization · land access inequality · Ontario · place-based knowledge · power redistribution · Agricultural Development and Management · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

  • Considering the source

    Open Access•Lee-Ann Sutherland, Lee‐ann Sutherland et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2013

  • Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture

    Open Access•Kazushi Takahashi, Rie Muraoka et al.•Agricultural Economics•2020

  • Cover Crop Champions

    Alison Bressler, Marta Plumhoff et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2021

  • Power

    Open Access•Steven Luke, Steven Lukes•Power•1974

  • Strengthening the performance of farming system groups

    Beena Anil, Matthew Tonts et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Humanising agricultural extension

    Open Access•Brian R Cook, Brian Cook et al.•World Development•2021

  • The Changing Relationship Between Private and Public Sector Agricultural Extension in Australia

    Open Access•Sally P Marsh, Sally Marsh et al.•Rural Society•1998

  • Challenging the populist perspective

    Open Access•John Thompson, I Scoones•Agriculture and Human Values•1994

  • Navigating shades of social capital and trust to leverage opportunities for rural innovation

    Open Access•Barbara J King, Barbara King et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Understanding power, social capital and trust alongside near real-time water quality monitoring and technological development collaboration

    Open Access•Simon Fielke, Bruce M Taylor et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Pluralism of agricultural advisory service providers – Facts and insights from Europe

    Open Access•Andrea Knierim, Pierre Labarthe et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation

    Open Access•Gabriela Cofré-Bravo, Laurens Klerkx et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • The changing public role in agricultural extension

    Open Access•John Farrington•Food Policy•1995

  • Privatization of agricultural extension services in the EU

    Open Access•Pierre Labarthe, Catherine Laurent•Food Policy•2012

  • Knowledge flows

    Open Access•Emma Thomas, Mark Riley et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Mixed public-private and private extension systems

    Open Access•Lorraine Balaine, Cathal Buckley et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • No more adoption rates! Looking for empowerment in agricultural development programmes

    Andrew Bartlett•Development in Practice•2008

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

  • Smallholders' demand for and access to private-sector extension services

    Open Access•Peter Fredslund Jensen, Martin Prowse et al.•Journal of Agrarian Change•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae