Thirty-five years after Farmer First

Embedding farmer participation in national agricultural policy and practice

Bibliographic Data

ID24228282
AuthorsMartina Occelli (0000-0002-5339-8601), Jacqueline Ashby (0009-0005-9599-1832), Marvin Gómez (0000-0002-0770-7696), Sally Humphries, Clare M Mukankusi, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Mamourou Sidibe, David J Spielman (0000-0002-6889-7358), John Thompson (0000-0002-3102-4035), Eva Weltzien (0000-0003-4484-1170), Hale Ann Tufan
Year2026
Volume43
Issue4
Publication date2026-10-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10460-026-10976-5
OpenAlexW7222243938
LanguageEN
References cited85

Thirty-five years ago, the Farmer First movement presented a new paradigm for agricultural R&D, making the case for a more prominent role for farmers in the design, development, and dissemination of agricultural technologies and practices. Since then, a diverse range of projects have been implemented with explicit attention to the engagement and participation of farmers and farmer-based organizations. After nearly four decades, it is worth reflecting further on the full extent of this paradigm’s impact on research and innovation policy. Specifically, has the movement led to the institutionalization of meaningful farmer engagement and participation in national policy formulation and implementation? To answer this question, we adopt a case study approach and combine project and public policy document analysis with key informant interviews held with actors in government, research institutions, donor agencies, and farmer organizations. We select three farmer-first-oriented projects in Honduras, Mali, and the eastern Africa region, each of which have had long exposure to the participatory principles we expect to see reflected in the agricultural policies of the country. We document the specific interactions between project actors and the policy space. We then analyze common policy trends across case studies. First, we find that change is often driven by highly motivated individuals who operate with a lack of buy-in from policy-relevant institutions. Second, we observe change when organizations practicing farmer-first approaches partner with more influential organizations, which may not have internalized those principles but have a common interest in the dissemination of technologies and practices. Third, we find that national agricultural policies in the case study countries are not codifying well-established participatory practices. We discuss pathways toward greater farmer participation in light of these findings.

Agricultural Development and Management · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agricultural Research and Practices

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access