Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unpacking industry influence in academia and public policy

A case study of the Dublin Declaration of Scientists

Bibliographic Data

ID24228306
AuthorsTara Kenny (0000-0002-8483-9262), Katherine Sievert (0000-0003-4617-8034), Colm Duffy (0000-0002-0076-6749), Paulo Sêrodio (0000-0001-6640-1091), M Mialon, Martin Caraher (0000-0002-0615-839X)
Year2026
Volume43
Issue2
Publication date2026-03-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10460-026-10859-9
OpenAlexW7134910500
LanguageEN
References cited79

The climate emergency poses many challenges for planetary health in the 21st century. Agriculture and food systems reform, including reductions in livestock production and consumption, in industrialised countries are numerously demonstrated as critically important for addressing the climate crisis. However, political commitment and action is lacking. Conflicting narratives about the role of livestock and meat contribute to public uncertainty and policy inertia, particularly when amplified by industry-aligned academic interventions such as the “Dublin Declaration of Scientists on the Societal Role of Livestock.”. Launched in 2022, the Declaration claims to promote a balanced, science-based discussion on the role of livestock in society. Using an embedded case study approach, this study examines how the Declaration operates through interlinked forms of structural, instrumental and discursive power - including selective curation of evidence, strategic coalition-building, and agenda-setting - and how these practices are enabled by public and private institutional arrangements. The findings underscore the need for closer scrutiny of initiatives and institutions that shape knowledge and discourse in ways that protect incumbent industry interests.

agenda setting · agricultural reform · Climate crisis · coalition building · discursive power · institutional arrangements · Livestock · meat consumption · planetary health · policy inertia · science-policy interface · structural power · Agricultural and Food Production Studies · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

  • The Poverty of Growth

    Olivier De Schutter•The Poverty of Growth•2024

  • How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review

    Open Access•Emily Savell, Anne Gilmore et al.•PLoS ONE•2014

  • The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system

    Open Access•Jennifer Clapp•Nature Food•2021

  • The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change

    Open Access•Marina Romanello, Maria Walawender et al.•The Lancet•2024

  • Food in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Walter Willett, Johan Rockström et al.•The Lancet•2019

  • Golden Holocaust

    Robert N Proctor•Golden Holocaust•2012

  • Beyond simple disclosure

    Open Access•Camille Raynes-Greenow, James A Gaudino et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Power and the commercial determinants of health

    Open Access•Jennifer Lacy‐Nichols, Rainer Martens•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Reconceptualising the commercial determinants of health

    Open Access•R Ralston, Charlotte Godziewski et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • Big food and the World Health Organization

    Open Access•Kathrin Lauber, Harry Rutter et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Corporate interest groups and their implications for global food governance

    Open Access•Scott Slater, Mark Lawrence et al.•Globalization and Health•2024

  • Beyond nutrition and physical activity

    Open Access•Mélissa Mialon, B A Abou‐Awad et al.•Globalization and Health•2021

  • A High-Powered Study Confirming the Misleading Nature of the Dublin Declaration

    Open Access•Ricardo Espinosa, Romain Espinosa et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2025

  • Ambitious food system interventions required to mitigate the risk of exceeding Earth’s environmental limits

    Open Access•Michalis Hadjikakou, Nicholas Bowles et al.•One Earth•2025

  • How power in corporate-industrial meat supply chains enables negative externalities

    Open Access•Katherine Sievert, Mark Lawrence et al.•One Earth•2024

  • National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane and climate policy

    Open Access•Colm Duffy, Carl Doedens et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Early US meat industry knowledge and response to global warming

    Open Access•Jennifer Jacquet, Viveca Morris et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Falling down the rabbit hole? Methodological, conceptual and policy issues in current health inequalities research

    Open Access•Michelle Kelly-Irving, William P Ball et al.•Critical Public Health•2022

  • A retrospective public health analysis of the Republic of Ireland's Food Harvest 2020 strategy

    Open Access•Tara Kenny, Mary E Cronin et al.•Critical Public Health•2017

  • Development of healthy and sustainable food-based dietary guidelines for the Netherlands

    Open Access•Elizabeth J Brink, Elizabeth Brink et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2019

  • The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda

    Alice Fabbri, Alexandra Lai et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Ruminating on sustainable food systems in a net-zero world

    Open Access•Bob Van Oort, Anne Sophie Daloz et al.•Nature Sustainability•2024

  • What’s really at ‘steak’? Understanding the global politics of red and processed meat reduction

    Open Access•Katherine Sievert, Mark Lawrence et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • A high-powered study confirming the misleading nature of the Dublin Declaration

    Open Access•Ricardo Espinosa, Jochen Krattenmacher et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Normalised, human-centric discourses of meat and animals in climate change, sustainability and food security literature

    Open Access•Paula Arcari•Agriculture and Human Values•2016

  • What's the beef

    Open Access•Damian Maye, John Fellenor et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Not All Influences on Science Are Conflicts of Interest

    Lisa Bero, Quinn Grundy•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Tobacco Industry Influence on Science and Scientists in Germany

    Thilo Grüning, Anne Gilmore et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2006

  • Conceptualising the policy engagement of interest groups

    Open Access•Darren Halpin, Darren R Halpin et al.•European Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Dublin Declaration

    Open Access•Jochen Krattenmacher, Ricardo Espinosa et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae