Contesting land-based greenhouse gas removal futures
Emerging sociotechnical visions of biochar in UK agriculture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24228339 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catherine Waddams Price (0000-0003-1846-5407), Carol Morris (0000-0001-7723-5658) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10460-026-10984-5 |
| OpenAlex | W7215123788 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
This paper critically examines the emerging sociotechnical visions of biochar within UK agriculture, focusing on its potential role in greenhouse gas removal (GGR) and the broader net zero agenda. Agriculture is framed as both a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions and a unique sector capable of acting as a carbon sink, positioning it at the heart of debates about climate change mitigation. The paper adopts a sociotechnical visions framework to illuminate how stakeholders align with, contest, and propose alternatives to the dominant net zero sociotechnical imaginary. We identify two overarching sociotechnical visions of biochar in UK agriculture. The first is a sociotechnical vision of greenhouse gas removal through biochar produced at scale and applied to agricultural land, detailing both farmer alignment with and contestation of this approach. The second is a sociotechnical vision of biochar for multiple on-farm benefits, including farm business benefits, enhanced agricultural production and improved on-farm biodiversity. The analysis shows that the future of biochar in UK agriculture is characterised by diversity and contestation, requiring governance frameworks that accommodate multiple, sometimes competing, sociotechnical visions. This pluralism offers opportunities for more just, inclusive, achievable, and transformative pathways for biochar in UK agriculture. Additionally, the paper contributes to the literature on sociotechnical imaginaries and sociotechnical visions by foregrounding the dynamic interplay and negotiation between top-down institutional imaginaries—such as net zero—and emergent, grassroots visions developed by farmers and other agricultural stakeholders.
agricultural governance · Biochar · British agriculture · Carbon sink · Climate change mitigation · farmer perspectives · Greenhouse gas removal · net-zero emissions · sociotechnical imaginaries · stakeholder contestation · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Science and Democracy
A roadmap for rapid decarbonization
The trouble with negative emissions
Futuramas of the present
How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures
Biochar in the UK Print News Media
Responsibility, rationality, and acceptance
Dreamscapes of Modernity
The Blind Spots of Sociotechnical Imaginaries
Knowledges in action
Renewing the future
Making fossil fuel futures
The intangible technological innovation system
Integrating sociotechnical and spatial imaginaries in researching energy futures
Wind energy meets buildings? Generating socio-technical change in the urban built environment through vanguard visions
What ‘climate positive future’? Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries of negative emissions in Sweden
Mapping diverse visions of energy transitions
Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility
Toward global net zero
Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity
Biochar carbon markets
Biochar
The role of visions in sustainability transformations
Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries for gene edited crops for foods in the United States
Cows eat grass, don't they? Contrasting sociotechnical imaginaries of the role of grazing in the UK and Irish dairy sectors
Biochar systems
Containing the Atom
Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries – How the smart home is legitimized in visions from industry, users in homes and policymakers in Germany
Unavoidable futures? How governments articulate sociotechnical imaginaries of AI and healthcare services
Using thematic analysis in psychology
How could it be our responsibility?” The equity of Local Authority climate action in England
Learning from the past and embracing future opportunities
Sociotechnical imaginaries for Canadian agri-food futures
How to build (in) the future? Legitimacy of socio-technical visions in a bio-based construction sector
Competing Transport Futures
Vanguard Visions of Vertical Farming
Embedding Carbon Markets
| Highly cited | No |
|---|